首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biological rhythms >What season is it anyway? Circadian tracking vs. photoperiodic anticipation in insects
【24h】

What season is it anyway? Circadian tracking vs. photoperiodic anticipation in insects

机译:反正是什么季节?昆虫的昼夜节律追踪与光周期预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The daily rhythm of 24 h and the annual rhythm of 12 mo constitute the 2 major, highly predictable rhythms of the biosphere. The internal circadian clock enables organisms to track daily changes in their environment; the photoperiodic timer, alone or in concert with a circannual clock, enables organisms to anticipate and prepare in advance for seasonal changes in their environment. The circadian clock entrains to dawn and dusk and tracks light and temperature on a day-to-day basis, while the photoperiodic timer serves as a long-term, physiological goo-go switch that commits an animal to development, reproduction, dormancy, or migration on a seasonal or even lifetime basis. In 1936, Erwin Bünning proposed that circadian rhythms formed the basis (Grundlage) for photoperiodic response to day length. Historical inertia generated by correlative evidence from early physiological studies and a proliferating number of descriptive models has resulted in the widespread assumption that the circadian clock constitutes the necessary, causal basis of photoperiodism in general. This historical inertia has also restricted the search for genes involved in insect photoperiodism to genes central to the circadian clock in Drosophila and has led investigators to conclude that any behavior, process, or gene expression that varies with day length represents photoperiodism or a gene involved in photoperiodism. The authors discuss how blinders imposed by the circadian imperative have retarded progress toward identifying the genetic basis of photoperiodism and how the insights gained from geographic variation in photoperiodic response have been used to show the independent evolution of the circadian clock and photoperiodism. When geographic variation is found in circadian genes, the most immediate and parsimonious search for adaptive significance should be in circadian function, not in extrapolation to photoperiodism. Finally, the authors propose that circadian-unbiased, forward genetic approaches should be used to identify genes involved in photoperiodism within extant populations and among populations over evolutionary time.
机译:24 h的每日节律和12 mo的年节律构成了生物圈的两个主要的,高度可预测的节律。内部的生物钟可以使生物追踪环境的日常变化;光周期定时器可以单独使用,也可以与周期时钟配合使用,使生物能够提前预测并为环境的季节性变化做好准备。昼夜节律时钟夹带到黎明和黄昏,并每天跟踪光和温度,而光周期计时器则是长期的生理性“通过/不通过”开关,使动物处于发育,繁殖,休眠状态,或者按季节甚至一生迁移。 1936年,欧文·邦宁(ErwinBünning)提出,昼夜节律构成了光周期对日长的响应的基础(G)。早期生理学研究的相关证据和大量描述性模型所产生的历史惯性已导致人们普遍认为,生物钟通常是光周期的必要因果基础。这种历史惯性也将对与昆虫光周期症有关的基因的搜索限制为果蝇昼夜节律的中心基因,并导致研究者得出结论,随日长变化的任何行为,过程或基因表达均表示光周期症或涉及的基因。光周期论。作者讨论了由昼夜节律所施加的盲目性如何阻碍了确定光周期的遗传基础的进展,以及如何利用从光周期反应的地理变化中获得的见解来显示昼夜节律和光周期的独立演变。当在昼夜节律基因中发现地理变异时,对适应性意义的最直接,最简约的搜索应该是在昼夜节律功能中,而不是推断为光周期。最后,作者建议应采用昼夜节律,正向遗传学方法来鉴定在现存种群中以及进化时间内种群之间与光周期有关的基因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号