首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Intensifying platelet inhibition with tirofiban in poor responders to aspirin, clopidogrel, or both agents undergoing elective coronary intervention: results from the double-blind, prospective, randomized Tailoring Treatment with Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel study.
【24h】

Intensifying platelet inhibition with tirofiban in poor responders to aspirin, clopidogrel, or both agents undergoing elective coronary intervention: results from the double-blind, prospective, randomized Tailoring Treatment with Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel study.

机译:在对阿司匹林,氯吡格雷或这两种药物进行选择性冠状动脉介入治疗的反应较差的患者中,使用替罗非班强化血小板抑制作用:对显示出对阿司匹林耐药和/或对氯吡格雷耐药的患者进行替罗非班双盲,前瞻性,随机量身定制治疗的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of platelet aggregation after aspirin or clopidogrel intake varies greatly among patients, and previous studies have suggested that poor response to oral antiplatelet agents may increase the risk of thrombotic events, especially after coronary angioplasty. Whether this reflects suboptimal platelet inhibition per se, which might benefit from more potent antiplatelet agents such as tirofiban, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened 1277 patients to enroll 93 aspirin, 147 clopidogrel, and 23 dual poor responders, based on a point-of-care assay, who underwent elective coronary angioplasty at 10 European sites for stable or low-risk unstable coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive either tirofiban (n=132) or placebo (n=131) on top of standard aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. The primary end point, consisting of troponin I/T elevation at least 3 times the upper limit of normal, was attained in 20.4% (n=27) in the tirofiban group compared with 35.1% (n=46) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.88; P=0.009). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days in the tirofiban group also was reduced (3.8% versus 10.7%; P=0.031). The overall incidence of bleeding was low, likely explained by a substantial use of the transradial approach, and did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk patients according to clinical presentation who had poor responsiveness to standard oral platelet inhibitors via a point-of-care assay, intensified platelet inhibition with tirofiban lowers the incidence of myocardial infarction after elective coronary intervention.
机译:背景:阿司匹林或氯吡格雷摄入后对血小板聚集的抑制作用在患者之间差异很大,并且先前的研究表明对口服抗血小板药的不良反应可能增加血栓形成事件的风险,尤其是在冠状动脉成形术后。尚不清楚这是否本身就反映了血小板抑制作用欠佳,这可能会受益于更有效的抗血小板药如替罗非班。方法和结果:我们基于即时诊断,筛选了1277例患者,纳入了93例阿司匹林,147例氯吡格雷和23例双重不良反应者,他们在欧洲的10个地点进行了稳定或低危不稳定冠状动脉择期冠状动脉成形术疾病。除标准阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗外,患者以双盲方式随机分配接受替罗非班(n = 132)或安慰剂(n = 131)。替罗非班组的主要终点包括肌钙蛋白I / T升高至少是正常上限的3倍,在替罗非班组中达到20.4%(n = 27),而在安慰剂组中达到35.1%(n = 46)(相对风险:0.58; 95%置信区间:0.39至0.88; P = 0.009)。替罗非班组在30天内的主要不良心血管事件发生率也降低了(3.8%对10.7%; P = 0.031)。出血的总发生率很低,这可能是由于大量使用经trans动脉途径所致,两组之间没有差异。结论:根据临床表现的低风险患者,通过即时护理对标准口服血小板抑制剂的反应较差,替罗非班强化血小板抑制作用可降低选择性冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌梗塞的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号