首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Subacute lack of asthma control and acute asthma exacerbation history as predictors of subsequent acute asthma exacerbations: evidence from managed care data.
【24h】

Subacute lack of asthma control and acute asthma exacerbation history as predictors of subsequent acute asthma exacerbations: evidence from managed care data.

机译:亚急性缺乏哮喘控制和急性哮喘急性发作史可作为随后急性哮喘急性发作的预测指标:来自管理医疗数据的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Monitoring indicators of subacute lack of asthma control (SALAC) may help to reduce asthma morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SALAC, independent of current asthma exacerbations, is associated with subsequent acute asthma exacerbations. METHODS: Administrative claims data from PharMetrics/IMS Health were used to identify patients 12 years or older continuously enrolled in a participating U.S. health plan from 2001 to 2004 with >or=1 asthma claim (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 493.x), no chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis claims, and >or=1 prescription for an asthma medication during 2001-2004. SALAC was defined as more than 4 asthma-related physician visits (or >or=2/quarter) or more than 5 short-acting beta((2))-adrenergic agonist prescriptions during 2001. Effect of asthma control category (Exacerbation Only [EO], SALAC Only [SO], Both Exacerbation and SALAC [Both], Neither Exacerbation nor SALAC [Neither]) in 2001 on acute asthma exacerbations (hospitalization, emergency department visit, or short-term oral corticosteroid use) during 2002-2004 was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for gender, age, health plan type, and region. RESULTS: Of 11,779 patients, 8% were assigned to the EO group, 26% to SO, 12% to Both, and 54% to Neither in 2001. The incidence of exacerbations in 2002-2004 was higher for Both (61.8%) versus EO (55.0%) and for SO (37.3%) versus Neither (31.9%). The risk of exacerbation in 2002-2004 was increased significantly (p < .0001) for Both (3.394; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.009, 3.827), EO (2.503; 95% CI = 2.176, 2.879), and SO (1.277; 95% CI = 1.166, 1.399) versus Neither. CONCLUSION: In this study, the risk of subsequent exacerbation was greatest in patients with both SALAC and acute asthma exacerbations, followed by those with exacerbations only and those with SALAC only. SO identified an additional 26% of asthma patients at increased risk for subsequent exacerbation. The results from this study demonstrate that SALAC indicators and a history of acute asthma exacerbations are independent predictors of future acute asthma exacerbations and highlight the important role of subacute asthma worsening in predicting and preventing future asthma exacerbations.
机译:背景:亚急性缺乏哮喘控制(SALAC)的监测指标可能有助于降低哮喘的发病率。目的:确定独立于目前哮喘发作的SALAC是否与随后的急性哮喘发作相关。方法:使用PharMetrics / IMS Health的行政理赔数据来识别从2001年至2004年连续入选参与美国健康计划且哮喘病索赔≥1的12岁或12岁以上的患者(国际疾病分类,第9次修订,临床修改代码493.x),没有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或囊性纤维化的主张,并且在2001-2004年间哮喘药物的处方≥1。 SALAC被定义为在2001年期间进行了4次以上的哮喘相关医师就诊(或≥2/季度)或5次以上的短效β((2))-肾上腺素能激动剂处方。哮喘控制类别的作用(仅加重[ EO],仅SALAC [SO],急性加重和SALAC均[两者],2001年因急性哮喘加重(住院,急诊就诊或短期口服皮质类固醇激素使用而加重和SALAC均无)。使用logistic回归对性别,年龄,健康计划类型和区域进行调整,对患者进行评估。结果:在11779名患者中,2001年EO组占8%,SO占26%,两者均占12%,两者均占54%。2002-2004年,两者的加重发生率均较高(61.8%) EO(55.0%)和SO(37.3%),两者均未达到(31.9%)。两者(3.394; 95%置信区间[CI] = 3.009,3.827),EO(2.503; 95%CI = 2.176,2.879)和SO均在2002-2004年加重发作的风险显着增加(p <.0001) (1.277; 95%CI = 1.166,1.399)。结论:在本研究中,SALAC和急性哮喘急性加重的患者,其后加重的风险最大,其次是仅加重和仅加SALAC的患者。 SO查明了另外26%的哮喘患者随后发作的风险增加。这项研究的结果表明,SALAC指标和急性哮喘急性发作史是未来急性哮喘急性发作的独立预测因子,并突出了亚急性哮喘恶化在预测和预防未来哮喘急性发作中的重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号