...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Cost-consequence analysis of multimodal interventions with environmental components for pediatric asthma in the state of Maryland
【24h】

Cost-consequence analysis of multimodal interventions with environmental components for pediatric asthma in the state of Maryland

机译:马里兰州儿童哮喘多模式干预与环境因素的成本-后果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Applied environmental strategies for asthma control are often expensive, but may save longer-term healthcare costs. Whether these savings outweigh additional costs of implementing these strategies is uncertain. Methods. We conducted a systematic review to estimate the expenditures and savings of environmental interventions for asthma in the state of Maryland. Direct costs included hospitalizations, emergency room, and clinic visits. Indirect expenditures included costs of lost work productivity and travel incurred during the usage of healthcare services. We used decision analysis, assuming a hypothetical cohort of the approximated 49,290 pediatric individuals in Maryland with persistent asthma, to compare costs and benefits of environmental asthma interventions against the standard of care (no intervention) from the societal perspective. Results. Three interventions among nine articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review: 1) environmental education using medical professionals; 2) education using non-medical personnel; and 3) multi-component strategy involving education with non-medical personnel, allergen-impermeable covers, and pest management. All interventions were found to be cost-saving relative to the standard of care. Home environmental education using non-medical professionals yielded the highest net savings of $14.1 million (95% simulation interval (SI): $-.283 million, $19.4 million), while the multi-component intervention resulted in the lowest net savings of $8.1 million (95% SI: $-4.9 million, $15.9 million). All strategies were most sensitive to the baseline number of hospitalizations in those not receiving targeted interventions for asthma. Conclusions. Limited environmental reduction strategies for asthma are likely to be cost-saving to the healthcare system in Maryland and should be considered for broader scale-up in other economically similar settings.
机译:背景。用于哮喘控制的应用环境策略通常很昂贵,但可以节省长期医疗费用。这些节省是否超过实施这些策略的额外成本尚不确定。方法。我们进行了系统的评估,以估算马里兰州哮喘的环境干预措施的支出和节省。直接费用包括住院,急诊室和诊所就诊。间接支出包括工作效率下降的成本以及在使用医疗服务期间发生的差旅费用。我们使用决策分析(假设在马里兰州患有持续性哮喘的大约49,290名儿科患者)进行假设队列,以从社会角度比较环境哮喘干预与护理标准(无干预)的成本和收益。结果。九篇文章中的三项干预措施达到了系统评价的纳入标准:1)使用医学专业人员进行环境教育; 2)使用非医务人员进行教育; (3)多部门战略,包括对非医务人员的教育,不渗透变应原的覆盖物和病虫害防治。相对于护理标准,发现所有干预措施均可以节省成本。使用非医学专业人员的家庭环境教育产生的净节省额最高,为1,410万美元(95%模拟间隔(SI):-。283百万美元,1,940万美元),而多部分干预的净节省额最低,为810万美元。 (95%SI:-490万美元,1590万美元)。在未接受针对性哮喘干预的患者中,所有策略均对基线住院数最为敏感。结论。限制哮喘的环境减少策略可能会为马里兰州的医疗保健系统节省成本,因此应考虑在其他经济上相似的环境中扩大规模以扩大规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号