...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Validity and Reproducibility of the Asthma Core International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Written Questionnaire Obtained by Telephone Survey.
【24h】

Validity and Reproducibility of the Asthma Core International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Written Questionnaire Obtained by Telephone Survey.

机译:通过电话调查获得的哮喘核心国际儿童哮喘和变态反应研究(ISAAC)书面问卷的有效性和可重复性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective. To assess the reproducibility and validity of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) asthma written questionnaire (IAWQ) for 6- to 7-year-old children administered to their parents/caregivers through a telephone interview. Methods. Our study included 100 children selected from three health units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In total, 50 asthmatic and 50 non-asthmatic children were evaluated; all participants were required to own a household telephone line. Initially, telephone interviews were conducted with the parents/caregivers using the IAWQ. After 2 weeks, parents/caregivers were invited to complete the IAWQ under supervision provided by the researchers. After fifteen days, the telephone interviews were repeated. The reproducibility between the two telephone interviews was assessed using kappa (κ) coefficients; the construct validity was assessed by comparing the answers obtained in the initial telephone interview in both groups according to the clinical diagnosis of asthma performed by a specialist using sensitivity and specificity coefficients. Results. Overall, data from 75 children (39 asthmatics) were analyzed, as 25 patients were excluded from the study (11 did not answer phone calls and the responding parents/caregivers for 14 patients were not the same in all study phases). Perfect agreement was observed for the indicator "wheezing in the last 12 months" (κ = 1), while substantial agreement was observed for the "wheezing with exercise," "speech limited by wheezing," and "asthma ever" indicators (κ range, 0.7-0.8). The sensitivity and specificity for "wheezing within the last 12 months" were 64.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 47.2-78.8) and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9), respectively. For the "asthma ever" indicator, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.2% (95% CI, 77.6-95.7) and 100% (95% CI, 90.3-1), respectively. Questionnaire specificity was high for all asthma severity indicators. Conclusions. The IAWQ for children aged 6-7 years adapted for telephone interviews showed good reproducibility and adequate validity with an ability to distinguish between asthmatic and non-asthmatic participants. Thus, this method could be utilized in epidemiological studies on childhood asthma in locations where telephone lines are available.
机译:目的。为了评估《国际儿童哮喘和变态反应研究》(ISAAC)哮喘书面调查表(IAWQ)的可重复性和有效性,该调查表是通过电话采访向父母/看护人服用的6至7岁儿童的。方法。我们的研究包括从巴西里约热内卢三个卫生部门中选出的100名儿童。总共评估了50名哮喘儿童和50名非哮喘儿童。所有参与者都必须拥有一条家庭电话线。最初,使用IAWQ与父母/看护人进行电话访问。 2周后,邀请父母/照顾者在研究人员提供的监督下完成IAWQ。 15天后,再次进行了电话采访。使用kappa(κ)系数评估两次电话访问之间的可重复性;根据专家使用敏感性和特异性系数对哮喘进行的临床诊断,通过比较两组初次电话采访中获得的答案来评估构建体的有效性。结果。总体上,分析了来自75名儿童(39名哮喘病患者)的数据,因为有25名患者被排除在研究之外(11名未接听电话,而14名患者的应答父母/监护人在所有研究阶段都不相同)。指标“过去12个月内喘息”(κ= 1)观察到完全一致,而“运动时喘息”,“喘息受限的语音”和“哮喘史”指标(κ范围)则观察到基本一致。 ,0.7-0.8)。 “最近12个月内打磨”的敏感性和特异性分别为64.1%(95%置信区间(CI),47.2-78.8)和88.9%(95%CI,73.9-96.9)。对于“有史以来哮喘”指标,敏感性和特异性分别为87.2%(95%CI,77.6-95.7)和100%(95%CI,90.3-1)。所有哮喘严重程度指标的调查表特异性均很高。结论。适用于电话访谈的6-7岁儿童的IAWQ具有良好的可重复性和足够的有效性,能够区分哮喘和非哮喘患者。因此,该方法可用于有电话线的地方的儿童哮喘的流行病学研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号