首页> 外文期刊>Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics >Comparison of magnetotail magnetic flux estimates based on global auroral images and simultaneous solar wind-magnetotail measurements
【24h】

Comparison of magnetotail magnetic flux estimates based on global auroral images and simultaneous solar wind-magnetotail measurements

机译:基于全局极光图像和同时进行的太阳风磁尾测量的磁尾磁通量估计值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared simultaneous magnetotail magnetic flux F estimates, (1) based on in situ spacecraft measurements in the tail and solar wind (F_T) with (2) the polar cap magnetic flux, estimated from global auroral images (using proton-induced or electron-induced emissions, F_p or F_e, respectively). Simultaneous F_p and F_e estimates gave the correlation coefficient CC=0.74, indicating that these measures are not absolutely precise. Regression analysis of F_T versus F_e and F_p gave CC values 0.73 and 0.50, correspondingly. F_T values, containing closed magnetic flux, are systematically higher than F_p and F_e by 20-30%. Motivated by diverse results, published by different groups, we reanalyzed the F dependence on the dayside merging electric field E_m for different dynamical states. The linear regression F(E_m) for substorm onsets shows a large slope ~0.07-0.12GWb/(mV/m) for all F_p, F_e and F_T, confirming the loading-unloading substorm scheme. For SMC intervals this slope is only 0.03GWb/(mV/m).
机译:我们比较了同时磁尾磁通量F的估计值,(1)基于尾部和太阳风(F_T)的原位航天器测量结果与(2)根据全球极光图像估计的极极帽磁通量(使用质子感应或电子感应发射,分别为F_p或F_e)。同时进行的F_p和F_e估计给出了相关系数CC = 0.74,这表明这些度量并非绝对精确。 F_T对F_e和F_p的回归分析得出CC值分别为0.73和0.50。包含闭合磁通量的F_T值系统地比F_p和F_e高20-30%。受不同小组发布的不同结果的激励,我们针对不同的动力学状态重新分析了F对日间合并电场E_m的依赖性。亚暴雨爆发的线性回归F(E_m)显示所有F_p,F_e和F_T的大斜率约为0.07-0.12GWb /(mV / m),这确认了装卸亚暴雨方案。对于SMC间隔,此斜率仅为0.03GWb /(mV / m)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号