首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Radial artery versus femoral artery access options in coronary angiogram procedures: randomized controlled trial of a patient-decision aid.
【24h】

Radial artery versus femoral artery access options in coronary angiogram procedures: randomized controlled trial of a patient-decision aid.

机译:冠状动脉造影术中动脉与股动脉的通路选择:患者决策辅助的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background- Vascular access options in coronary angiography can be considered a preference-sensitive decision, where the benefits/risks have different levels of significance, depending on the individual patient. For preference-sensitive healthcare options, patient decision aids (PtDA) significantly improve the process of decision-making. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based PtDA compared with usual care in patients eligible for radial and femoral artery access. Methods and Results- We conducted a single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial with patients eligible for both femoral and radial access as per their treating physician. The PtDA was designed to guide patients to make an informed choice, consistent with their preferences and values. The primary outcome, decisional conflict, was assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale. One hundred fifty patients were randomized (vascular access PtDA=76 versus usual care=74). The intervention group had a significantly reduced decisional conflict scale compared with control (unadjusted 14.8 versus 19.5, P=0.04) and were significantly more knowledgeable regarding risks/benefits associated with each vascular access (mean knowledge score 3/5 (95% confidence interval, 2.6 to 3.3) versus 2/5 (95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 2.3, P<0.01). PtDA patients had better informed value congruence with their vascular access received (47.3% versus 25.7%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in procedural success or safety between the 2 groups. Conclusions- A vascular access PtDA for eligible patients undergoing coronary angiogram procedures reduces decisional conflict and improves value congruence and the patients' knowledge of their healthcare options; however, a multicenter study, powered to confirm these benefits and evaluate differences in procedural success or complications, is required. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01032551.
机译:背景-冠状动脉造影术中的血管通路选择可以被认为是一种偏爱敏感的决定,其中获益/风险的重要性不同,具体取决于患者的个体。对于偏爱敏感的医疗保健选择,患者决策辅助器(PtDA)可显着改善决策过程。该试验的目的是评估在符合radial动脉和股动脉入路的患者中,与常规治疗相比,循证PtDA的有效性。方法和结果-我们进行了一项单中心,无盲,随机对照试验,根据治疗医师对既有股骨也有radial骨入路的患者进​​行了研究。 PtDA旨在指导患者根据自己的偏好和价值观做出明智的选择。主要结果,即决策冲突,是使用经过验证的决策冲突量表进行评估的。一百五十名患者被随机分组​​(血管通路PtDA = 76 vs常规护理= 74)。与对照组相比,干预组的决策冲突量显着减少(未调整的14.8对19.5,P = 0.04),并且对与每次血管通路相关的风险/益处的了解明显更多(平均知识评分3/5(95%置信区间, 2.6到3.3)和2/5(95%置信区间,1.7到2.3,P <0.01)。PtDA患者在接受血管方面的知情价值一致性更高(47.3%对25.7%,P <0.01)。结论:两组患者在程序成功或安全性上的显着差异结论:对接受冠状动脉造影检查的合格患者进行血管通路PtDA可以减少决策冲突并提高价值一致性和患者对其医疗保健选择的了解;然而,一项多中心研究旨在确认这些益处并评估程序成功或并发症的差异,需要临床试验注册-URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。标识符:NCT01032551。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号