...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Comparison of manual thrombus aspiration with rheolytic thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction
【24h】

Comparison of manual thrombus aspiration with rheolytic thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction

机译:急性心肌梗死人工血栓抽吸与溶栓治疗的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background-Manual thrombus aspiration (MTA) is completely ineffective in 30% of cases, and the high profiles of the catheters prevent their use in tortuous and calcified vessels. The rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) device has the potential for improved thrombus removal in acute myocardial infarction as compared with MTA. No data exist on the comparison between the 2 techniques. Methods and Results-Randomized study, including 80 acute myocardial infarction patients allocated to RT or MTA before infarct artery stenting. Primary end point of this study is residual thrombus burden by optical coherence tomography. Secondary end points are (1) residual thrombolysis in myocardial infarction thrombus grade; (2) postintervention thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow and myocardial blush; (3) early ST-segment resolution; (4) percentage of malapposed stent struts at 6 months; (5) 6-month restenosis; and (6) 6-month major adverse cardiovascular events. All but 1 patient had residual thrombus after manual aspiration thrombectomy or RT. The number of optical coherence tomography quadrants containing thrombus in MTA arm was higher than in the RT arm, but this difference did not reach significance (median value 65 and 53, respectively; P=0.083). Large residual thrombus was more frequently revealed in the manual aspiration thrombectomy arm (patients with number of quadrants above the median value 60% in the manual aspiration thrombectomy arm and 37% in the RT arm, P=0.039). All markers of reperfusion were better in the RT arm. At 6 months, the percentage of malapposed stent struts in the MTA arm was higher than in the RT arm (2.7±4.5% and 0.8±1.6%, respectively; P=0.019). Conclusions-MTA or RT allows only incomplete removal of thrombus in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The primary end point of the study was not met. However, RT as compared with MTA seems to be more effective in thrombus removal and myocardial reperfusion.
机译:背景-手动血栓抽吸(MTA)在30%的病例中完全无效,导管的高轮廓阻止了它们在曲折和钙化血管中使用。与MTA相比,溶栓性血栓切除术(RT)装置具有改善急性心肌梗塞血栓清除的潜力。两种技术之间没有比较数据。方法和结果-随机研究,包括80例在梗死动脉支架置入前分配为RT或MTA的急性心肌梗死患者。这项研究的主要终点是通过光学相干断层扫描技术残留的血栓负担。次要终点是:(1)心肌梗塞血栓级别的残余溶栓; (2)介入后溶栓在心肌梗塞血流和心肌红中的作用; (3)早期的ST段解析; (4)6个月时支架支杆不良的百分比; (5)6个月的再狭窄; (6)6个月的主要不良心血管事件。除1名患者外,其余所有患者均在手动抽吸血栓切除术或RT后残留血栓。 MTA组中包含血栓的光学相干断层扫描象限数量高于RT组,但这一差异没有达到显着性(中位数分别为65和53; P = 0.083)。在手动抽吸血栓切除术组中更经常发现大的残留血栓(象限数目高于中位数的患者在手动抽吸血栓切除术组中为60%,而在RT臂术中为37%,P = 0.039)。 RT组的所有再灌注指标均较好。在6个月时,MTA臂的支架支撑不良比例高于RT臂(分别为2.7±4.5%和0.8±1.6%; P = 0.019)。结论:MTA或RT仅允许急性心肌梗死患者血栓未完全清除。没有达到研究的主要终点。但是,与MTA相比,RT在清除血栓和心肌再灌注方面似乎更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号