首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (approval)
【24h】

Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (approval)

机译:单盲,随机研究的结果,比较了不同消融方法对并发性房颤和扑动(批准)的长期手术结局的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND-: This study examined the impact of different ablation strategies on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and quality of life in coexistent AF and atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS-: Three-hundred sixty enrolled patients with documented AF and AFL were blinded and randomized to group 1, AF±AFL ablation (n=182), or group 2, AFL ablation only (n=178). AF recurrence was evaluated with event recording and 7-day Holter at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-ups. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up with 4 questionnaires: the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Of the 182 patients in group 1, 58 (age, 63±8 years; 78% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 59±8%) had AF+AFL ablation and 124 (age, 61±11 years; 72% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 59±7%) had AF ablation only. In group 2 (age, 62±9 years; 76% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 58±10%), only AFL was ablated by achieving bidirectional isthmus conduction block. Baseline characteristics were not different across groups. At 21±9 months of follow-up, 117 in group 1 (64%) and 34 in group 2 (19%) were arrhythmia free (P<0.001). In group 1, scores on most quality-of-life subscales showed significant improvement at follow-up, whereas group 2 patients derived relatively minor benefit. CONCLUSIONS-: In coexistent AF and AFL, lower recurrence rate and better quality of life are associated with AF ablation only or AF+AFL ablation than with lone AFL ablation. Furthermore, quality of life directly correlates with freedom from arrhythmia, as shown in this study for the first time in patients blinded to the procedure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-: URL: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01439386.
机译:背景:这项研究探讨了不同的消融策略对房颤和房扑并存的房颤(AF)复发和生活质量的影响。方法和结果-:对360例AF和AFL记录的入选患者进行盲法,并随机分为第1组AF±AFL消融(n = 182)或第2组AFL消融(n = 178)。在3、6、9和12个月的随访中,通过事件记录和7天动态心电图评估房颤的复发率。在基线和12个月的随访中,使用4份问卷评估生活质量:医疗结果研究简表,医院焦虑和抑郁评分,贝克抑郁量表和状态特质焦虑量表。在第1组的182例患者中,有58名(年龄63±8岁;男性78%;左心室射血分数59±8%)进行了AF + AFL消融;有124例(年龄61±11岁;男性72%;男性)。左心室射血分数(59±7%)仅房颤消融。第2组(年龄62±9岁;男性76%;左心室射血分数58±10%)中,仅通过双向峡部传导阻滞消融了AFL。各组之间的基线特征没有不同。在21±9个月的随访中,第1组117例(64%)和第2组34例(19%)无心律失常(P <0.001)。在第1组中,大多数生活质量量表的分数在随访中均显示出明显改善,而第2组患者的获益相对较小。结论-:在房颤和房颤并存的情况下,与单纯房颤消融相比,仅房颤消融或房颤+房颤消融的复发率较低,生活质量更好。此外,如本研究首次显示对手术不知情的患者,生活质量与是否患有心律不齐直接相关。临床试验注册-:URL:http://www.clinicaltrial.gov/。唯一标识符:NCT01439386。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号