首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian Economics >An assessment of relative globalization in Asia during the 1980s and 1990s
【24h】

An assessment of relative globalization in Asia during the 1980s and 1990s

机译:对1980年代和1990年代亚洲相对全球化的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses factor and discriminant analyses to generate indices of globalization. The first part of the paper describes the technique and we find that the Netherlands is the most globalized and Sierra Leone the least. In the second part of the paper, comparisons are made between South Asian, East Asian and Middle East countries to see if relative globalization process is proceeding at a faster or slower pace. Although the analysis is mostly regional, we introduce evidence for several countries, including Sri Lanka, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand, India and Malaysia to compare globalization and openness. Based on our findings, several conclusions are drawn concerning progress made and the economic implications of that progress. Because of the poor showing of Pakistan's globalization efforts, special attention has been focused on that country. The main finding is that Pakistan appeal's to have fallen into a vicious cycle of low and declining globalization leading to low productivity causing low rates of return on investment. The result is low investment and technology transfer which only reinforces the drift towards an increasing globalization gap with the country's main international competitors.
机译:本文使用因素和判别分析来生成全球化指标。本文的第一部分介绍了该技术,我们发现荷兰是全球化程度最高的地区,塞拉利昂则是最少的。在本文的第二部分中,对南亚,东亚和中东国家进行了比较,以了解相对全球化进程是在加快还是在放缓。尽管分析主要是区域性的,但我们介绍了斯里兰卡,巴基斯坦,菲律宾,泰国,印度和马来西亚等多个国家的证据,以比较全球化和开放性。根据我们的发现,就所取得的进展以及该进展的经济意义得出了一些结论。由于巴基斯坦的全球化努力表现不佳,因此特别关注了该国。主要发现是,巴基斯坦的呼吁已陷入全球化程度低下和不断下降的恶性循环,导致生产率低下,投资回报率低。结果是低投资和技术转让,这只会加剧与该国主要国际竞争对手之间日益扩大的全球化差距的转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号