...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Bedside multimarker testing for risk stratification in chest pain units: The chest pain evaluation by creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I (CHECKMATE) study.
【24h】

Bedside multimarker testing for risk stratification in chest pain units: The chest pain evaluation by creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I (CHECKMATE) study.

机译:床旁多标记物检测以胸痛为单位的危险分层:通过肌酸激酶-MB,肌红蛋白和肌钙蛋白I(CHECKMATE)研究评估胸痛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Earlier, rapid evaluation in chest pain units may make patient care more efficient. A multimarker strategy (MMS) testing for several markers of myocardial necrosis with different time-to-positivity profiles also may offer clinical advantages. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively compared bedside quantitative multimarker testing versus local laboratory results (LL) in 1005 patients in 6 chest pain units. Myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and troponin I were measured at 0, 3, 6, 9 to 12, and 16 to 24 hours after admission. Two MMS were defined: MMS-1 (all 3 markers) and MMS-2 (creatine kinase-MB and troponin I only). The primary assessment was to relate marker status with 30-day death or infarction. More patients were positive by 24 hours with MMS than with LL (MMS-1, 23.9%; MMS-2, 18.8%; LL, 8.8%; P=0.001, all comparisons), and they became positive sooner with MMS-1 (2.5 hours, P=0.023 versus LL) versus MMS-2 (2.8 hours, P=0.026 versus LL) or LL (3.4 hours). The relation between baseline MMS status and 30-day death or infarction was stronger (MMS-1: positive, 18.8% event rate versus negative, 3.0%, P=0.001; MMS-2: 21.9% versus 3.2%, P=0.001) than that for LL (13.6% versus 5.5%, P=0.038). MMS-1 discriminated 30-day death better (positive, 2.0% versus negative, 0.0%, P=0.007) than MMS-2 (positive, 1.8% versus negative, 0.2%; P=0.055) or LL (positive, 0.0% versus negative, 0.5%; P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid multimarker analysis identifies positive patients earlier and provides better risk stratification for mortality than a local laboratory-based, single-marker approach.
机译:背景:较早地对胸痛病房进行快速评估可以使患者护理更加有效。对具有不同时间阳性反应曲线的心肌坏死的几种标志物进行多标志物策略(MMS)测试也可能具有临床优势。方法和结果:我们前瞻性地比较了1005例6个胸痛单元的患者的床旁定量多标记检测与局部实验室检查结果(LL)。入院后0、3、6、9至12和16至24小时测量肌红蛋白,肌酸激酶-MB和肌钙蛋白I。定义了两个MMS:MMS-1(所有3个标记)和MMS-2(仅肌酸激酶-MB和肌钙蛋白I)。主要评估是将标记物状态与30天死亡或梗塞相关联。在24小时内,MMS阳性的患者多于LL(MMS-1,23.9%; MMS-2,18.8%; LL,8.8%; P = 0.001,所有比较),并且MMS-1早呈阳性( 2.5小时,P = 0.023对LL)对MMS-2(2.8小时,P = 0.026对LL)或LL(3.4小时)。基线MMS状态与30天死亡或梗塞之间的关系更强(MMS-1:阳性,事件发生率18.8%,阴性,3.0%,P = 0.001; MMS-2:21.9%对3.2%,P = 0.001)高于LL(13.6%对5.5%,P = 0.038)。与MMS-2(阳性,1.8%vs阴性,0.2%; P = 0.055)或LL(阳性,0.0%)相比,MMS-1更好地区分30天死亡(阳性,2.0%vs阴性,0.0%,P = 0.007)相对于负数,为0.5%; P = 1.000)。结论:与基于本地实验室的单标记方法相比,快速的多标记分析可以更早地鉴定出阳性患者,并为死亡提供更好的危险分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号