...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging research >Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?
【24h】

Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?

机译:简短的全球风险评估(用于社区筛查的风险工具)的哪一部分预测不良医疗保健结果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC) is a short, global risk assessment to identify community-dwelling older adults' one-year risk of institutionalisation, hospitalisation, and death. We investigated the contribution that the three components of the RISC (concern, its severity, and the ability of the caregiver network to manage concern) make to the accuracy of the instrument, across its three domains (mental state, activities of daily living (ADL), and medical state), by comparing their accuracy to other assessment instruments in the prospective Community Assessment of Risk and Treatment Strategies study. RISC scores were available for 782 patients. Across all three domains each subtest more accurately predicted institutionalisation compared to hospitalisation or death. The caregiver networks ability to manage ADL more accurately predicted institutionalisation (AUC 0.68) compared to hospitalisation (AUC 0.57, P = 0.01) or death (AUC 0.59, P = 0.046), comparing favourably with the Barthel Index (AUC 0.67). The severity of ADL (AUC 0.63), medical state (AUC 0.62), Clinical Frailty Scale (AUC 0.67), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (AUC 0.66) scores had similar accuracy in predicting mortality. Risk of hospitalisation was difficult to predict. Thus, each component, and particularly the caregiver network, had reasonable accuracy in predicting institutionalisation. No subtest or assessment instrument accurately predicted risk of hospitalisation.
机译:社区筛查风险工具(RISC)是一项简短的全球风险评估,旨在识别社区居住的老年人在机构化,住院和死亡方面的一年风险。我们调查了RISC的三个组成部分(关注度,严重性以及护理者网络处理关注的能力)对仪器在其三个领域(精神状态,日常生活活动(ADL))中准确性的贡献。 )和医学状态),方法是将其准确性与前瞻性社区风险与治疗策略评估研究中的其他评估工具进行比较。 782名患者可获得RISC评分。与住院或死亡相比,在所有三个领域中,每个子测验均能更准确地预测机构化。与住院(AUC 0.57,P = 0.01)或死亡(AUC 0.59,P = 0.046)相比,照顾者网络管理ADL的能力更准确地预测了机构化(AUC 0.68)或死亡(与Barthel Index(AUC 0.67)相比)。 ADL的严重程度(AUC 0.63),医学状态(AUC 0.62),临床虚弱量表(AUC 0.67)和查尔森合并症指数(AUC 0.66)评分在预测死亡率方面具有相似的准确性。住院风险很难预测。因此,每个组成部分,尤其是看护者网络,在预测机构化方面具有合理的准确性。没有任何子测试或评估工具能够准确预测住院风险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号