首页> 外文期刊>Journal of AOAC International >Evaluation of Commonly Used Methods for the Analysis of Acid-Soluble Phosphate in Internationally Traded Inorganic Fertilizers
【24h】

Evaluation of Commonly Used Methods for the Analysis of Acid-Soluble Phosphate in Internationally Traded Inorganic Fertilizers

机译:国际贸易无机肥料中酸溶性磷酸盐分析常用方法的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Several methodologies are used throughout the world to determine phosphate concentration (measured as PO4 and expressed as % P2O5) in fertilizers. Concentrated phosphate materials, including diammonium phosphate (DAP) and monoammonium phosphate (MAP), are traded in large volumes (millions of metric tons) internationally. The International Fertilizer Association (IFA) identified a need to assess the methods currently being used to measure the phosphate content for suitability (scope), accuracy, and repeatability. Even small discrepancies in the expressed P2O5 content can have a major financial impact on buyers and sellers as contracts are settled and import regulations are imposed. The IFA's Technical Committee selected a working group to address issues dealing with harmonization of fertilizer sampling and analytical methodologies. The working group identified phosphate content in DAP and MAP fertilizers as a major concern for commerce. The working group initiated a method screening and comparison project to assess method performance and to determine which methods, if any, could be considered best practice methods and, therefore, be deemed acceptable for use by the industry. In order to systematically review the acceptability of methods for consideration, the task force developed an assessment protocol outlined in a white paper involving three steps: (1) compile all known relevant methods practiced in global fertilizer trade, (2) review and evaluate methods based upon specific evaluation criteria, and (3) compare the methods that most closely fit the evaluation criteria by multilaboratory analysis of unknown materials for accuracy and repeatability. Six methods were evaluated for analysis of total phosphate in concentrated phosphate products. From these methods, four were determined to be acceptable as best practice methods. The study members proposed three of the methods, while a fourth method was commonly used among the participating laboratories. This publication is a summary of the method comparison process and statistical evaluation of analysis of total phosphate content in concentrated phosphate fertilizers.
机译:全世界使用多种方法来确定肥料中的磷酸盐浓度(以PO4表示,以P2O5表示)。浓缩的磷酸盐材料,包括磷酸二铵(DAP)和磷酸一铵(MAP),在国际上交易量很大(百万公吨)。国际肥料协会(IFA)认为有必要评估当前用于测量磷酸盐含量的方法的适用性(范围),准确性和可重复性。所表达的P2O5含量即使很小的差异也可能对买卖双方产生重大的财务影响,因为合同已经结算,并且实施了进口法规。 IFA技术委员会选择了一个工作组来处理与化肥采样和分析方法的统一有关的问题。工作组确定DAP和MAP肥料中的磷酸盐含量是商业的主要关注点。工作组启动了方法筛选和比较项目,以评估方法的性能并确定哪些方法(如果有的话)可以视为最佳实践方法,因此被业界接受。为了系统地审查要考虑的方法的可接受性,工作队制定了一份白皮书中概述的评估协议,包括三个步骤:(1)汇编全球肥料贸易中实践的所有已知相关方法;(2)审查和评估基于方法的方法根据特定的评估标准,(3)通过对未知材料进行多实验室分析,比较最适合评估标准的方法,以确保准确性和可重复性。评价了六种方法用于分析浓缩磷酸盐产品中的总磷酸盐。从这些方法中,确定有四个可以作为最佳实践方法。研究成员提出了三种方法,而参与研究的实验室通常使用第四种方法。该出版物概述了浓缩磷酸盐肥料中总磷酸盐含量的方法比较过程和统计评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号