...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Differences in posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic rates and symptom severity between Criterion A1 and non-Criterion A1 stressors
【24h】

Differences in posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic rates and symptom severity between Criterion A1 and non-Criterion A1 stressors

机译:Criterion A1和非Criterion A1应激源在创伤后应激障碍诊断率和症状严重程度方面的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study addresses the ongoing controversy regarding the definition of DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder's (PTSD) traumatic stressor criterion (A1). A sample of 119 college students completed the PTSD Symptom Scale separately in relation to both Criterion A1 and non-Criterion A1 stressful events, using a mixed between-groups (administration order) and within-subjects (stressor type) design. Contrary to what was expected, analyses revealed that non-Criterion A1 events were associated with greater likelihood of "probable" PTSD diagnoses and a greater PTSD symptom frequency than Criterion Al events. Symptom frequency relationships, however, were moderated by the order in which the measures were administered. The non-Criterion A1 PTSD scores were only higher when non-Criterion A1 measures were presented first in the administration order. Similar patterns of differences in PTSD scores between stressor types were also found across the three PTSD symptom criteria. Implications are discussed as to the ongoing controversy of the PTSD construct.
机译:这项研究解决了有关DSM-IV创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)创伤性应激源标准(A1)定义的争议。 119名大学生的样本分别使用组间(管理顺序)和受试者内部(压力源类型)设计,分别完成了与标准A1和非标准A1压力事件相关的PTSD症状量表。与预期相反,分析显示,与Criterion A1事件相比,非Criterion A1事件与“可能” PTSD诊断的可能性更高,且PTSD症状发生率更高。但是,症状频率之间的关系通过采取措施的顺序来缓和。仅当在管理顺序中首先提出非标准A1措施时,非标准A1 PTSD分数才更高。在三种PTSD症状标准之间,也发现应激源类型之间PTSD评分差异的相似模式。讨论了有关PTSD结构的持续争议的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号