首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >The contribution of attentional bias to worry: distinguishing the roles of selective engagement and disengagement.
【24h】

The contribution of attentional bias to worry: distinguishing the roles of selective engagement and disengagement.

机译:注意偏见引起的担忧:区分选择性参与和脱离接触的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated the effect on worry of biased attentional engagement and disengagement. Variants of a novel attention modification paradigm were developed, designed to induce a group difference either in participants' tendency to selectively engage with, or disengage from, threatening meanings. An index of threat bias, reflecting relative speeding to process threat word compared to non-threat word content, confirmed that both procedures were effective in inducing differential attentional bias. Importantly, when the induced group difference in attentional bias followed the procedure designed to influence selective engagement with threat meanings, it also gave rise to a corresponding group difference in worry. This was not the case when it was induced by the procedure designed to influence selective disengagement from threat meanings. These findings suggest that facilitated attentional engagement with threat meanings may causally contribute to variability in worry.
机译:这项研究调查了偏向注意力参与和脱离对焦虑的影响。一种新的注意力修饰范例的变体被开发出来,旨在在参与者倾向于威胁性含义的选择或脱离倾向方面引起群体差异。威胁偏见指数反映了处理威胁词相对于非威胁词内容的相对速度,证实了这两种程序均能有效地引起差异性注意偏见。重要的是,当诱发的偏见群体差异遵循旨在影响具有威胁意义的选择性参与的程序时,也会引起相应的担忧差异。当它是由旨在影响威胁含义的选择性脱离接触的程序引起的时,情况并非如此。这些发现表明,促进注意力集中于威胁含义可能会导致忧虑的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号