首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging >Improved left ventricular mass quantification with partial voxel interpolation in vivo and necropsy validation of a novel cardiac MRI segmentation algorithm
【24h】

Improved left ventricular mass quantification with partial voxel interpolation in vivo and necropsy validation of a novel cardiac MRI segmentation algorithm

机译:体内局部体素插值改善活体左心室质量的定量和尸检验证一种新型心脏MRI分割算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) typically quantifies LV mass (LVM) by means of manual planimetry (MP), but this approach is time-consuming and does not account for partial voxel components- myocardium admixed with blood in a single voxel. Automated segmentation (AS) can account for partial voxels, but this has not been used for LVM quantification. This study used automated CMR segmentation to test the influence of partial voxels on quantification of LVM. Methods and Results-LVM was quantified by AS and MP in 126 consecutive patients and 10 laboratory animals undergoing CMR. AS yielded both partial voxel (ASPV) and full voxel (AS FV) measurements. Methods were independently compared with LVM quantified on echocardiography (echo) and an ex vivo standard of LVM at necropsy. AS quantified LVM in all patients, yielding a 12-fold decrease in processing time versus MP (0:21±0:04 versus 4:18±1:02 minutes; P0.001). AS FV mass (136±35 g) was slightly lower than MP (139±35; δ=3±9 g, P0.001). Both methods yielded similar proportions of patients with LV remodeling (P=0.73) and hypertrophy (P=1.00). Regarding partial voxel segmentation, ASPV yielded higher LVM (159±38 g) than MP (δ=20±10 g) and AS FV (δ=23±6 g, both P0.001), corresponding to relative increases of 14% and 17%. In multivariable analysis, magnitude of difference between ASPV and AS FV correlated with larger voxel size (partial r=0.37, P0.001) even after controlling for LV chamber volume (r=0.28, P=0.002) and total LVM (r=0.19, P=0.03). Among patients, ASPV yielded better agreement with echo (δ=20±25 g) than did AS FV (δ=43±24 g) or MP (δ=40±22 g, both P0.001). Among laboratory animals, ASPV and ex vivo results were similar (δ=1±3 g, P=0.3), whereas AS FV (6±3 g, P0.001) and MP (4±5 g, P=0.02) yielded small but significant differences with LVM at necropsy. Conclusions-Automated segmentation of myocardial partial voxels yields a 14-17% increase in LVM versus full voxel segmentation, with increased differences correlated with lower spatial resolution. Partial voxel segmentation yields improved CMR agreement with echo and necropsy-verified LVM.
机译:背景心脏磁共振(CMR)通常通过手动平面测量(MP)来量化左心室质量(LVM),但是这种方法很耗时,并且无法说明部分体素成分-心肌与血液混合在单个体素中。自动分割(AS)可以解决部分体素的问题,但这尚未用于LVM量化。这项研究使用自动CMR分割来测试部分体素对LVM量化的影响。方法和结果通过AS和MP对连续126例接受CMR的患者和10只实验动物的LVM进行了定量。 AS生成部分体素(ASPV)和完整体素(AS FV)的测量值。将方法与超声心动图(回波)上定量的LVM和尸检时LVM的离体标准进行独立比较。 AS量化了所有患者的LVM,与MP相比,处理时间减少了12倍(0:21±0:04与4:18±1:02分钟; P <0.001)。 AS FV质量(136±35 g)略低于MP(139±35;δ= 3±9 g,P <0.001)。两种方法产生的左室重塑(P = 0.73)和肥大(P = 1.00)患者比例相似。关于部分体素分割,ASPV产生的LVM(159±38 g)高于MP(δ= 20±10 g)和AS FV(δ= 23±6 g,均P <0.001),相对增加了14%和17%。在多变量分析中,即使在控制左室容积(r = 0.28,P = 0.002)和总LVM(r = 0.19)之后,ASPV和AS FV之间的差异大小也与更大的体素大小相关(部分r = 0.37,P <0.001)。 ,P = 0.03)。在患者中,ASPV与回声(δ= 20±25 g)产生的回声比AS FV(δ= 43±24 g)或MP(δ= 40±22 g,两者均P <0.001)更好。在实验动物中,ASPV和离体结果相似(δ= 1±3 g,P = 0.3),而AS FV(6±3 g,P <0.001)和MP(4±5 g,P = 0.02)产生尸检时与LVM的差异很小但很明显。结论相对于完整的体素分割,自动分割心肌局部体素可使LVM增加14-17%,差异增加与空间分辨率降低相关。通过回声和尸体验证的LVM,部分体素分割可改善CMR一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号