首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.
【24h】

Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.

机译:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的运输时间和护理流程:在卡罗来纳州急诊室进行急性心肌梗塞的再灌注。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, guidelines have called for device activation within 90 minutes of initial presentation. Fewer than 20% of transferred patients are treated in such a timely fashion. We examine the association between transfer drive times and door-to-device (D2D) times in a network of North Carolina hospitals. We compare the feasibility of timely percutaneous coronary intervention using ground versus air transfer.We perform a retrospective analysis of the relationship between transfer drive times and D2D times in a 119-hospital ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction statewide network. Between July 2008 and December 2009, 1537 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients underwent interhospital transfer for reperfusion via primary percutaneous coronary intervention. For ground transfers, median D2D time was 93 minutes for drive times ≤30 minutes, 117 minutes for drive times of 31 to 45 minutes, and 121 minutes for drive times >45 minutes. For air transfers, median D2D time was 125 minutes for drive times of 31 to 45 minutes and 138 minutes for drive times >45 minutes. Helicopter transport was associated with longer door-in door-out times and, ultimately, was associated with median D2D times that exceeded guideline recommendations, no matter the transfer drive time category.In a well-developed ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction system, D2D times within 90 to 120 minutes appear most feasible for hospitals within 30-minute transfer drive time. Helicopter transport did not offer D2D time advantages for transferred STEMI patients. This finding appears to be attributable to comparably longer door-in door-out times for air transfers.
机译:对于将ST段抬高型心肌梗死转移至原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,指南要求在初次就诊后90分钟内激活设备。不到20%的转移患者得到及时治疗。我们在北卡罗来纳州医院的网络中研究了传输驱动时间与门到设备(D2D)时间之间的关联。我们比较了地面和空气传输及时经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性。我们回顾性分析了119医院ST段抬高型心肌梗死全州网络中传输驱动时间与D2D时间之间的关系。在2008年7月至2009年12月之间,对1537例ST段抬高的心肌梗死患者进行了院际转移,以通过主要的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗进行再灌注。对于地面交通,行驶时间≤30分钟的D2D中值时间为93分钟,行驶时间31至45分钟的D2D中值时间为117分钟,行驶时间> 45分钟的D2D中值时间为121分钟。对于空气传输,对于31至45分钟的行驶时间,D2D中值时间为125分钟,对于大于45分钟的行驶时间,D2D中位时间为138分钟。直升机运输与更长的进门出门时间有关,并且最终与D2D中值时间有关,而该时间超过了指南的建议,无论转运时间是什么类别。在发达的ST段抬高型心肌梗死系统中,对于医院而言,在30分钟的转移车程时间内,D2D时间在90到120分钟之内显得最可行。对于转移的STEMI患者,直升机运输没有D2D时间优势。这一发现似乎是由于空气传输的进门出门时间相对较长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号