首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >Review Essay Commodity Studies and Commodity Fetishism I: Trading Down
【24h】

Review Essay Commodity Studies and Commodity Fetishism I: Trading Down

机译:评论文章商品研究与商品拜物教I:交易下跌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This first instalment of a two-part review essay on current work in commodity studies considers, at some length, an important and distinctive text by Peter Gibbon and Stefano Ponte. It draws on a unique set of case studies of African export commodities, using (and developing) the framework of Global Value Chain (GVC) theory, of American provenance, together with elements of the mostly French literature on quality conventions. Gibbon and Ponte also seek to incorporate key mechanisms of globalization and international trade, and their forms of regulation, and to evaluate the effects of the book's analysis and argument for prospects of improving the performance of African agricultural exports in particular. Here we provide a detailed exposition, discussion, and assessment of the book. We conclude that, for all its intellectual virtues, there are some central tensions in its argument that reflect the lacunae and limitations of the kind of economic sociology the authors employ - which, conten-tiously, they designate as 'historical political economy'.
机译:关于商品研究当前工作的两部分评论文章的第一部分在一定程度上考虑了Peter Gibbon和Stefano Ponte的重要而独特的文本。它利用(和发展)全球价值链(GVC)理论框架,美国渊源以及大多数法国质量公约文献的内容,对非洲出口商品进行了一系列独特的案例研究。 Gibbon和Ponte还寻求整合全球化和国际贸易的关键机制及其监管形式,并评估该书的分析和论证的效果,以期改善非洲农产品的出口表现。在这里,我们对本书进行了详细的阐述,讨论和评估。我们得出的结论是,尽管在理论上有种种美德,但在其论点中仍存在着一些中心矛盾,反映出作者所采用的那种经济社会学的缺陷和局限性,它们被连续地称为“历史政治经济学”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号