首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics >A Comparison of Actual and Hypothetical Willingness to Pay of Parents and Non-Parents for Protecting Infant Health: The Case of Nitrates in Drinking Water
【24h】

A Comparison of Actual and Hypothetical Willingness to Pay of Parents and Non-Parents for Protecting Infant Health: The Case of Nitrates in Drinking Water

机译:父母和非父母保护婴儿健康的实际和假设支付意愿比较:饮用水中的硝酸盐案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We estimate adults' willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce health risks to their own or other families' infants to test for altruism. A conjoint analysis of adults paying for bottled water found marginal WTP for reduction in risk of shock, brain damage, and mortality in the cash treatment of 2 dollar, 3.70 dollar, and 9.43 dollar, respectively. In the hypothetical market these amounts were 14 dollar, 26 dollar, and 66 dollar, indicating substantial hypothetical bias, although not unexpected due to the topic of infant health. Statistical tests confirm a high degree of altruism in our WTP results, and altruism held even when real money was involved.
机译:我们估计成年人愿意为降低自己或其他家庭婴儿的健康风险而进行利他测试的支付意愿(WTP)。成年人对使用瓶装水付费的一项联合分析发现,在现金治疗中,分别减少2美元,3.70美元和9.43美元的电击,脑部损伤和死亡率的风险,边际水处理费用较低。在假设的市场中,这些金额分别为14美元,26美元和66美元,表明存在重大的假设偏差,尽管由于婴儿健康这个话题并不意外。统计测试证实了我们的WTP结果中的高度利他主义,即使涉及真实货币,利他主义仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号