首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Education >Effects of Think–Aloud Pair Problem Solving on Secondary–Level Students’ Performance in Career and Technical Education Courses
【24h】

Effects of Think–Aloud Pair Problem Solving on Secondary–Level Students’ Performance in Career and Technical Education Courses

机译:大声对问题解决对中学生职业和技术教育课程成绩的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A randomized posttest–only control group experimental design was used to determine the effects of think–aloud pair problem solving (TAPPS) on the troubleshooting performance of 34 secondary–level career and technical education students. There was no significant difference in success rate between TAPPS students and students who worked alone (X~2 (1) = .747, P = .39, PHI = .148). There was no significant difference in completion time between students who successfully completed the troubleshooting task using TAPPS and those who were successful working alone (t (9) = –.74, P = .48, d = 0.45). The reserachers tentatively concluded that the use of TAPPS may not be an appropriate strategy at the secondary level if the agricultural instructors’ focus is a higher success rate and a reduction in the time to complete the task. However, agricultural instructors may have other legitimate reasons for using TAPPS such as a way to facilitate collaborative learning or as a way for instructors to identify student misunderstandings that could be used to inform decisions about individualized or even group instructional interventions.
机译:仅采用随机测验的对照组实验设计来确定思考配对问题解决(TAPPS)对34名中等职业和技术教育学生的故障排除性能的影响。 TAPPS学生和单独工作的学生的成功率没有显着差异(X〜2(1)= .747,P = 0.39,PHI = .148)。使用TAPPS成功完成故障排除任务的学生和单独工作成功的学生之间的完成时间没有显着差异(t(9)= –.74,P = .48,d = 0.45)。研究人员初步得出结论,如果农业指导员的重点是更高的成功率和减少完成任务的时间,那么在中学阶段使用TAPPS可能不是合适的策略。但是,农业教师可能还有其他使用TAPPS的正当理由,例如,促进协作学习的方式,或者是教师识别学生的误会的方式,这些误会可用于指导有关个性化甚至小组性教学干预的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号