...
首页> 外文期刊>Japanese journal of clinical oncology. >Differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung: Are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma prognostically equal?
【24h】

Differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung: Are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma prognostically equal?

机译:鳞状细胞癌和肺腺癌之间的区别:腺癌和鳞状细胞癌的预后是否相等?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We analyzed pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma patient survival in our single institution database, to evaluate the relationship of histologic analysis to survival and tumor aggressiveness. Methods: We reviewed 1856 consecutive patients with surgically resected pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma regarding their clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival and recurrence-free proportion. Results: In squamous cell carcinoma patients, there were more elderly male smokers and more patients with T2-4 tumors, moderately/poorly differentiated tumors, lymph node metastasis or vascular invasion than in adenocarcinoma patients. In all patients and in pN0 patients, patients with squamous cell carcinoma showed significantly poorer overall survival than those with adenocarcinoma, but there were no statistically significant differences in the recurrence-free proportion between the two histologic types. There were statistically significantly more lung cancer-specific deaths in patients with adenocarcinoma than in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P= 0.001). Conclusions: There were no differences in the development of recurrence between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung, but considerable differences in overall survival were observed between the two histologic types. According to the stage grouping strategy of the TNM Classification for Lung and Pleural Tumours, these two histologic types need to be staged differently. This survival difference, however, may reflect the difference in patient background rather than in biologic aggressiveness between the two histologic types.
机译:目的:我们在单一机构数据库中分析了肺鳞状细胞癌和腺癌患者的生存率,以评估组织学分析与生存率和肿瘤侵袭性之间的关系。方法:我们回顾了1856例连续手术切除的肺鳞状细胞癌或腺癌患者的临床病理特征,总体生存率和无复发率。结果:与腺癌患者相比,鳞状细胞癌患者中,老年男性吸烟者更多,T2-4肿瘤,中/低度分化肿瘤,淋巴结转移或血管侵犯的患者更多。在所有患者和pN0患者中,鳞状细胞癌患者的总生存期均显着低于腺癌患者,但两种组织学类型的无复发比例无统计学差异。统计学上,与鳞状细胞癌患者相比,腺癌患者的肺癌特异性死亡人数显着增加(P = 0.001)。结论:鳞状细胞癌和肺腺癌的复发发展无差异,但两种组织学类型在总生存率方面存在相当大的差异。根据TNM肺和胸膜肿瘤分类的分期分组策略,这两种组织学类型需要分阶段进行。但是,这种生存差异可能反映了两种组织学类型之间患者背景的差异,而不是生物学攻击性的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号