...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Evaluation of dried distillers grains and roughage source in steam-flaked corn finishing diets.
【24h】

Evaluation of dried distillers grains and roughage source in steam-flaked corn finishing diets.

机译:蒸制玉米片后整理日粮中酒糟和粗饲料来源的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two studies were conducted to evaluate effects of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) and alfalfa hay (AH) or corn silage (CS) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, ruminal fermentation, and diet digestibility in cattle fed steam-flaked corn (SFC) diets. In trial 1, crossbred heifers (n = 358; BW = 353 pl 13 kg) were used in a finishing trial to evaluate interactions between corn-DDGS and roughage source (AH or CS) in terms of impact on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. Experimental diets (DM basis) consisted of SFC and 11% CS without DDGS (SFC-CS), SFC and 11% CS with 25% DDGS (DDGS-CS), SFC and 6% AH without DDGS (SFC-AH), and SFC with 25% DDGS and 6% AH (DDGS-AH). Heifers were fed for ad libitum intake once daily for 97 d. Results indicated no interaction between DDGS and roughage source with respect to animal performance. Feeding DDGS did not affect ADG (P = 0.19), DMI (P = 0.14), or feed conversion (P = 0.67). Heifers fed CS had greater DMI than those fed AH (P = 0.05), but ADG (P = 0.56) and G:F (P = 0.63) were not different. There were no differences among treatments with respect to HCW, dressing percentage, subcutaneous fat thickness, quality grades, or yield grades (P > 0.20). Cattle fed CS tended (P = 0.10) to have greater marbling scores than those fed AH. There was an interaction (P = 0.02) between roughage and DDGS with respect to incidence of liver abscess. The greatest incidence was observed in cattle fed diets without DDGS when CS was fed, and the least was observed in cattle fed diets without DDGS when AH was used. In the second trial, ruminal fermentation characteristics and diet digestibility were examined in 12 cannulated Holstein steers fed similar diets to those fed in the finishing trial. Ruminal pH for all treatments was below 5.8 for 14 h after feeding. Acetate:propionate ratios were less (P = 0.02) in steers fed 25% DDGS but had greater (P = 0.02) ruminal lactate concentrations compared with cattle fed 0% DDGS. Feeding 25% DDGS decreased (P < 0.01) ruminal ammonia concentrations, and digestion of DM and OM was less (P < 0.01) compared with diets without DDGS. The decrease in digestibility was largely attributable to decreases in digestion of CP (P = 0.03) and NDF (P < 0.01). Feeding strategies aimed at increasing ruminal pH and ruminally available protein may improve digestion of DDGS in steam-flaked corn-based finishing diets.
机译:进行了两项研究,以评估干燥的酒糟含可溶物(DDGS)和苜蓿干草(AH)或玉米青贮饲料(CS)对饲喂牛的水蒸气玉米片(SFC)的饲养场性能,car体特性,瘤胃发酵和日粮消化率的影响)饮食。在试验1中,杂种小母牛(n = 358;体重= 353 pl 13公斤)用于肥育试验,以评估玉米DDGS与粗饲料来源(AH或CS)之间的相互作用,从而对饲养场性能和car体特性产生影响。实验饮食(以DM为基础)由SFC和11%不含DDGS的CS(SFC-CS),SFC和11%含25%DDGS的CS(DDGS-CS),SFC和6%不含DDGS的AH(SFC-AH)组成,以及具有25%DDGS和6%AH的SFC(DDGS-AH)。小母牛每天随意采食一次,持续97天。结果表明,DDGS和粗饲料来源之间在动物性能方面没有相互作用。饲喂DDGS不会影响ADG(P = 0.19),DMI(P = 0.14)或饲料转化率(P = 0.67)。饲喂CS的小母牛的DMI高于饲喂AH的小母牛(P = 0.05),但ADG(P = 0.56)和G:F(P = 0.63)没有差异。 HCW,敷料百分比,皮下脂肪厚度,质量等级或屈服等级在治疗之间无差异(P> 0.20)。饲喂CS的牛趋向于(P = 0.10)比饲喂AH的牛具有更高的大理石花纹得分。就肝脓肿的发生而言,粗饲料和DDGS之间存在相互作用(P = 0.02)。当饲喂CS时,在无DDGS的牛饲喂日粮中发生率最高,而当使用AH时,在无DDGS的牛饲喂日粮中发生率最低。在第二项试验中,对12头饲喂与最终试验中饲喂相似日粮的空心荷斯坦ste牛的瘤胃发酵特性和日粮消化率进行了检查。喂食后14 h,所有处理的瘤胃pH均低于5.8。与饲喂0%DDGS的牛相比,饲喂25%DDGS的公牛的乙酸:丙酸比例较低(P = 0.02),但瘤胃乳酸浓度较高(P = 0.02)。与不添加DDGS的日粮相比,饲喂25%DDGS的瘤胃氨水浓度降低了(P <0.01),而DM和OM的消化减少了(P <0.01)。消化率的下降主要归因于CP(P = 0.03)和NDF(P <0.01)的消化率下降。旨在提高瘤胃pH值和瘤胃中可利用蛋白质的饲喂策略可以改善以玉米片为原料的蒸煮日粮中DDGS的消化率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号