...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Differential item functioning of the HADS and PHQ-9: An investigation of age, gender and educational background in a clinical UK primary care sample
【24h】

Differential item functioning of the HADS and PHQ-9: An investigation of age, gender and educational background in a clinical UK primary care sample

机译:HADS和PHQ-9的差异项功能:英国临床初级保健样本中年龄,性别和教育背景的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) are commonly used measures in clinical practice and research. It is important that such scales measure the trait they purport to measure and that the impact of other measurement artefacts is minimal. Differential item functioning of these scales by gender, educational background and age is currently assessed. Methods: Severity of depression and anxiety symptoms were measured in primary care patients referred to mental health workers using the PHQ-9 and HADS. Each scale was assessed for Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and Differential Test Function (DTF) by gender, educational background and age. Minimum n per analysis=895. DIF was assessed with Mantel's χ2, Liu-Agresti cumulative common odds ratio (LA LOR) and the standardised LA LOR (LA LOR-Z). DTF was assessed in relation to ν2. Results: PHQ-9, HADS Depression Sub-scale (HADS-D) and HADS Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A) lacked bias in terms of gender and educational background (ν20.07). However, both PHQ-9 and HADS-D exhibited bias with regard to age: PHQ-9 ν2=0.103 (medium effect); HADS-D ν2=0.214 (large effect). PHQ-9 items exhibiting DIF by age covered: anhedonia, energy and low mood. HADS-D items exhibiting DIF by age covered psychomotor retardation and interest in appearance. Limitations: No assessment of other potential DIF contributors was made. Conclusions: PHQ-9, HADS-D and HADS-A generally do not exhibit bias for gender and educational background. However bias was observed in PHQ-9 and HADS-D for age. Caution should be exercised interpreting scores both in clinical practice and research.
机译:背景:患者健康调查表(PH​​Q-9)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)是临床实践和研究中常用的措施。重要的是,此类标尺应测量其声称要测量的特征,并且其他测量伪影的影响应最小。目前正在评估按性别,教育背景和年龄划分的这些量表的差异项功能。方法:使用PHQ-9和HADS测量转介给精神卫生工作者的初级保健患者的抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度。通过性别,教育背景和年龄,对每个量表的差异项功能(DIF)和差异测试功能(DTF)进行评估。每次分析的最小n = 895。使用Mantel的χ2,Liu-Agresti累积共同优势比(LA LOR)和标准化的LA LOR(LA LOR-Z)评估DIF。相对于ν2评估了DTF。结果:PHQ-9,HADS抑郁量表(HADS-D)和HADS焦虑量表(HADS-A)在性别和教育背景方面均缺乏偏见(ν2<0.07)。但是,PHQ-9和HADS-D均显示出年龄偏倚:PHQ-9ν2= 0.103(中等效果); HADS-Dν2= 0.214(大效果)。 PHQ-9物品按年龄显示DIF:快感低下,精力充沛和情绪低落。按年龄显示DIF的HADS-D项目涵盖了精神运动迟钝和对外观的兴趣。局限性:没有评估其他潜在的DIF贡献者。结论:PHQ-9,HADS-D和HADS-A通常不表现出性别和教育背景的偏见。但是,PHQ-9和HADS-D的年龄存在偏差。在临床实践和研究中均应谨慎解释分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号