...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Which symptoms are indicative of DSMIV depression in cancer settings? An analysis of the diagnostic significance of somatic and non-somatic symptoms
【24h】

Which symptoms are indicative of DSMIV depression in cancer settings? An analysis of the diagnostic significance of somatic and non-somatic symptoms

机译:哪些症状表明在癌症环境中DSMIV抑郁?躯体和非躯体症状的诊断意义分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There have been few studies that have attempted to examine the phenomenology of comorbid depression, in particular the diagnostic value of individual somatic and non-somatic symptoms when attempting to diagnose depression following cancer. Methods: We approached 279 patients up to three times within 9 months of first presentation with a diagnosis of cancer, and collected data following a total of 558 contacts. 176 contacts (31%) were in a palliative stage. Symptoms were elicited by self-report PHQ9 and HADS-D scales. The prevalence of major depression was 12.7% but 29.6% had major or minor depression (any depressive disorder) according to modified DSMIV criteria. Results: All symptoms of depression were significant more common in depressed versus non-depressed cancer patients regardless of stage. Against broadly defined any depressive disorder (ADD) the most accurate diagnostic symptoms were all somatic (namely trouble falling or staying asleep or sleeping too much; feeling tired or having little energy; poor appetite or overeating; trouble concentrating on things such as reading). Indeed the optimal symptom insomnia had good case-finding properties and screening properties used alone. A two step combination of three questions give a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91.6% against ADD. Against major depressive disorder (MDD) both somatic and non-somatic symptoms were valuable (including but not limited to the PHQ2 stem questions). Only low energy was poorly discriminating which may suggest that the standard ICD10 criteria may not be optimal. When considering depression as defined by the HADS-D (≥ 11), then the three most influential symptoms were psychological closely followed by somatic symptoms. When looking for MDD and HADS-D depression, no single symptom was a good proxy for depression highlighting a possible shortcoming if clinicians attempt to rely on one single question. In a subset of palliative patients feeling bad about yourself and moving or speaking slowly were less influential and outperformed by poor appetite/overeating and feeling tired or having little energy. Conclusion: This research suggests that most somatic symptoms remain influential when diagnosing depression in the context of cancer and hence should not be omitted indiscriminately, even in palliative stages. The optimal symptoms for diagnosing depression will depend on whether a narrow concept of depression or a broad concept of depression is considered clinically important.
机译:背景:很少有研究试图检查共病抑郁的现象学,特别是在尝试诊断癌症后的抑郁症时个体躯体和非躯体症状的诊断价值。方法:在首次就诊的9个月内,我们对279例患者进行了三次随访,诊断出癌症,并在总共558次接触后收集了数据。 176位接触者(31%)处于姑息阶段。症状是通过自我报告PHQ9和HADS-D量表引起的。根据改良的DSMIV标准,重度抑郁症的患病率为12.7%,但重度或轻度抑郁症(任何抑郁症)的患病率为29.6%。结果:无论是否分期,抑郁症患者的所有抑郁症状都比非抑郁症患者更为常见。相对于广义的任何抑郁症(ADD),最准确的诊断症状都是躯体性的(即难以入睡,难以入睡或睡眠过多,感到疲倦或精力不足,食欲不振或暴饮暴食,难以集中精力阅读等东西)。的确,最佳症状性失眠症具有良好的病例发现特性和单独使用的筛查特性。由三个问题组成的两步​​式组合,对ADD的敏感性为100%,特异性为91.6%。对于重度抑郁症(MDD),躯体和非躯体症状都很有价值(包括但不限于PHQ2词干问题)。只有低能量难以区分,这可能表明标准ICD10标准可能不是最佳选择。当考虑由HADS-D(≥11)定义的抑郁时,最有影响力的三个症状是心理上紧随其后的是躯体症状。在寻找MDD和HADS-D抑郁症时,没有单一的症状可以很好地替代抑郁症,突出表明如果临床医生试图依靠一个单一的问题,则可能存在缺点。在部分姑息性患者中,对自己感到不舒服,移动或说话缓慢的影响较小,并且食欲不佳/暴饮暴食,疲倦或精神不振,表现不佳。结论:这项研究表明,大多数体征在癌症背景下诊断抑郁时仍然具有影响力,因此,即使在姑息治疗阶段,也不应无差别地省略。诊断抑郁症的最佳症状将取决于狭窄的抑郁症概念还是广泛的抑郁症临床重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号