首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: A report of OPERATION study
【24h】

Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: A report of OPERATION study

机译:患有抗焦虑药和非抗焦虑药的中国人群缓解症状的差异:OPERATION研究报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A secondary analysis was conducted to compare treatment outcomes for anxious depression and nonanxious depression in previous published OPERATION trials of a variety of antidepressants and augmentation strategies for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: A total of 375 patients that met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) and the stage 2 TRD criteria (described by Thase & Rush) were enrolled. Anxious depression was defined as MDD with a HRSD-17 anxiety/somatization factor score ≥7. Data were derived from an earlier study, designed to compare efficacy and tolerability of fixed dosage of extended-release venlafaxine, mitazapine, paroxetine, and risperidone, sodium valproate, buspirone, trazodone or thyroid hormone augmenting to paroxetine in those patients. Treatment outcomes were compared between patients with anxious and nonanxious TRD. Results: Nearly 70%of participants had anxious depression. Remission rates were significantly lower and ratings of adverse event frequency were significantly greater in patients with anxious TRD than in those with nonanxious TRD. Presence of anxious depression predicted worse outcomes. Limitations: Lack of a placebo control arm prevents us from ruling out placebo effects. The two groups were non-randomly allocated to medications. Only patients with stage 2 TRD were enrolled, which may limit generalizablity to patients without a history of resistance. Comorbid anxiety disorders that might confound the specific treatment effects were not addressed. Conclusions: The findings support and extend the hypothesis that anxious depression is associated with poorer outcomes. It suggests a dimensional assessment of co-occurring anxious features of MDD patients may be clinically feasible for countries like China where difficulties in making comorbidity diagnosis exist.
机译:背景:在先前发表的针对各种抗抑郁药的抗抑郁药和增强策略的抗抑郁药(TRD)患者的OPERATION试验中,进行了二级分析,以比较焦虑抑郁和非焦虑抑郁的治疗结果。方法:共有375名符合DSM-IV重度抑郁症(MDD)标准和2期TRD标准(由Thase&Rush描述)的患者入组。焦虑抑郁定义为HRSD-17焦虑/躯体化因子得分≥7的MDD。数据来自较早的一项研究,旨在比较固定剂量的文拉法辛,米氮平,帕罗西汀和利培酮,丙戊酸钠,丁螺环酮,曲唑酮或甲状腺激素对帕罗西汀的增效作用与固定剂量的疗效和耐受性。比较了焦虑和非焦虑TRD患者的治疗结果。结果:近70%的参与者患有焦虑抑郁症。与非焦虑TRD患者相比,焦虑TRD患者的缓解率显着降低,不良事件发生频率的评分显着更高。焦虑抑郁的存在预示着较差的结果。局限性:缺乏安慰剂控制臂使我们无法排除安慰剂的作用。两组均非随机分配药物。仅招募了2期TRD的患者,这可能会将其普遍性限制在无耐药史的患者中。没有解决可能混淆具体治疗效果的合并症焦虑症。结论:这些发现支持并扩展了焦虑抑郁与不良预后相关的假设。这表明,对于像中国这样存在合并症诊断困难的国家,对MDD患者同时出现的焦虑特征进行尺寸评估可能在临床上可行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号