首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Pre-morbid and outcome correlates of first episode mania with psychosis: Is a distinction between schizoaffective and bipolar I disorder valid in the early phase of psychotic disorders?
【24h】

Pre-morbid and outcome correlates of first episode mania with psychosis: Is a distinction between schizoaffective and bipolar I disorder valid in the early phase of psychotic disorders?

机译:首发躁狂症与精神病的病前和结果相关性:精神分裂性情感障碍和双相I型障碍之间的区别在精神病性障碍的早期是否有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The validity of schizoaffective disorder (SA) diagnosis has for long been a matter of controversy and its delineation from bipolar I disorders (BD) has often been questioned. However, most studies have been conducted in chronic samples and have therefore been biased towards patients with poorer outcome, which may have hampered the possibility to identify significant differences between both diagnoses. METHODS: 108 subjects presenting a first DSM-III-R manic episode with psychotic features were assessed at baseline and 12 months after stabilisation on symptoms and functional characteristics, and patients with BD (n=87) were compared with those with SA bipolar subtype (SAB) (n=21). RESULTS: SAB patients had a higher prevalence of first degree relatives with schizophrenia and a lower premorbid functional level. They had a longer prodromal phase, a longer duration of untreated psychosis and remained symptomatic for a longer period. They also had higher levels of positive symptoms in the acute manic phase; however, with two exceptions, the type of psychotic symptoms were similar in both groups. At stabilisation and 12 months after stabilisation, SA patients had higher levels of negative symptoms, with poorer functional level at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest SA is a valid diagnosis in the early phase of psychotic disorders considering it defines a subgroup of first episode psychotic mania patients with distinct characteristics compared to BD. While a dimensional approach to diagnosis may be more adapted to this phase of illness, SA disorder offers, in the context of categorical classifications, a useful intermediate category that reflects a clinical reality.
机译:目的:分裂情感障碍(SA)诊断的有效性长期以来一直是一个有争议的问题,其对双相I障碍(BD)的描述经常受到质疑。但是,大多数研究都是在慢性样本中进行的,因此偏向于预后较差的患者,这可能妨碍了在两次诊断之间发现明显差异的可能性。方法:在基线和稳定症状和功能特征后12个月对108例首次出现精神病性DSM-III-R躁狂发作的受试者进行评估,并将BD患者(n = 87)与SA双相型亚型的患者进行比较( SAB)(n = 21)。结果:SAB患者一级亲属精神分裂症患病率较高,病前功能水平较低。他们的前驱期更长,精神病未经治疗的时间更长,并且有症状的时间更长。他们在急性躁狂期也有较高的阳性症状。但是,除了两个例外,两组的精神病症状类型相似。在稳定期和稳定期后12个月,SA患者的阴性症状水平较高,而在12个月时功能水平较差。结论:这些数据表明SA是精神病性疾病的早期诊断,因为它定义了首发性精神病性躁狂症患者的一个亚组,与BD相比具有独特的特征。尽管多维诊断方法可能更适合此疾病阶段,但在分类分类的背景下,SA紊乱提供了反映临床现实的有用中间类别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号