首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology >Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: PROSPECT-ECG substudy.
【24h】

Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: PROSPECT-ECG substudy.

机译:起搏的左心室QRS宽度和ECG参数可预测心脏再同步治疗后的结局:PROSPECT-ECG子研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: For patients with symptomatic New York Heart Association class III or IV, ejection fraction /= 130 ms, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established treatment option. However, use of these implant criteria fails to result in clinical or echocardiographic improvement in 30% to 45% of CRT patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT)-ECG is a substudy of the prospective observational PROSPECT trial. ECGs collected before, during, and after CRT implantation were analyzed. Primary outcomes were improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and reduction of left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) of >15% after 6 months. Age, sex, cause of cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction location, right ventricular function, mitral regurgitation, preimplantation QRS width, preimplantation PR interval, preimplantation right ventricular-paced QRS width, preimplantation axis categories, LV-paced QRS width, postimplantation axis categories, difference between biventricular (Bi-V) pacing and preimplantation QRS width, and QRS bundle branch morphological features were analyzed univariably in logistic regression models to predict outcomes. All significant predictors (alpha=0.1), age, and sex were used for multivariable analyses. Cardiomyopathy cause interaction and subanalyses were also performed. In multivariable analyses, only QRS left bundle branch morphological features predicted both CCS (odds ratio [OR]=2.46, P=0.02) and LVESV (OR=2.89, P=0.048) response. The difference between Bi-V and preimplantation QRS width predicted CCS improvement (OR=0.89, P=0.04). LV-paced QRS width predicted LVESV reduction (OR=0.86, P=0.01). Specifically, an LV-paced QRS width of
机译:背景:对于有症状的纽约心脏协会III级或IV级,射血分数 / = 130 ms的患者,心脏再同步治疗(CRT)已成为一种公认的治疗选择。但是,使用这些植入标准不能使30%至45%的CRT患者获得临床或超声心动图改善。方法和结果:对CRT(PROSPECT)-ECG的反应预测因子是前瞻性观察性PROSPECT试验的子研究。分析在CRT植入之前,期间和之后收集的ECG。主要结果是6个月后临床综合评分(CCS)改善和左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)降低> 15%。年龄,性别,心肌病的病因,心肌梗死的位置,右心室功能,二尖瓣反流,植入前QRS宽度,植入前PR间隔,植入前右心室起搏QRS宽度,植入前轴类别,LV起搏QRS宽度,植入后轴类别,差异在Logistic回归模型中单变量分析双室(Bi-V)起搏与植入前QRS宽度之间的关系以及QRS束分支形态特征以预测结果。所有显着预测因子(alpha = 0.1),年龄和性别均用于多变量分析。心肌病引起相互作用,还进行了亚分析。在多变量分析中,只有QRS左束支形态特征预测了CCS(奇数比[OR] = 2.46,P = 0.02)和LVESV(OR = 2.89,P = 0.048)的响应。 Bi-V和植入前QRS宽度之间的差异可预测CCS改善(OR = 0.89,P = 0.04)。 LV步调QRS宽度可预测LVESV降低(OR = 0.86,P = 0.01)。具体而言,LV起搏QRS宽度

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号