首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Low-dose aspirin and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in primary versus secondary cardiovascular prevention a population-based, nested case-control study
【24h】

Low-dose aspirin and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in primary versus secondary cardiovascular prevention a population-based, nested case-control study

机译:低剂量阿司匹林和上消化道出血在一级和二级心血管预防中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-The benefit-risk profile of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is unclear. We sought to quantify upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) risk associated with low-dose aspirin in secondary versus primary prevention patients. Methods and Results-We performed a population-based nested case-control study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database between 2000 and 2007. We identified 2049 cases of UGIB and 20 000 controls, frequencymatched to the cases on age, sex, and calendar year, who were subdivided into primary (without previous cardiovascular disease) and secondary (with previous cardiovascular disease) prevention populations. We estimated the relative risk of UGIB associated with the use of low-dose aspirin by multivariate logistic regression. The UGIB risk in patients taking low-dose aspirin relative to nonusers was significantly higher in the primary (adjusted relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.26) than in the secondary (relative risk, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.72; P value for the difference=0.0014) prevention cohort. However, as the baseline risk of UGIB was lower in the primary than in the secondary prevention cohort, numbers needed to harm per 1 year of low-dose aspirin use were 601 and 391 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Conclusions-The relative risk of UGIB in patients taking low-dose aspirin is higher when used for primary than for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention, but this difference is more than compensated by the lower baseline risk in the primary prevention population. Such estimates are important for an assessment of the net clinical benefit in primary prevention.
机译:背景-低剂量阿司匹林在心血管疾病一级预防中的获益风险特征尚不清楚。我们试图量化二级预防与一级预防患者低剂量阿司匹林相关的上消化道出血(UGIB)的风险。方法和结果-我们在2000年至2007年之间使用健康改善网络(THIN)数据库进行了基于人群的嵌套病例对照研究。我们确定了2049例UGIB病例和20000例对照,其频率与年龄,性别和日历年,这些人群又分为一级预防人群(无先前的心血管疾病)和二级预防人群(有先前的心血管疾病)。我们通过多元logistic回归估计了与使用低剂量阿司匹林相关的UGIB的相对风险。相对于非使用者,服用低剂量阿司匹林的患者的UGIB风险在主要患者(调整后相对风险为1.90; 95%置信区间为1.59-2.26)中明显高于次要患者(相对风险为1.40; 95%置信区间, 1.14-1.72;差异的P值= 0.0014)预防队列。但是,由于一级人群中UGIB的基线风险低于二级预防人群,因此,一级和二级预防每1年低剂量阿司匹林使用所需伤害的数字分别为601和391。结论:低剂量阿司匹林用于一级预防的患者的UGIB相对风险高于二级心血管疾病的预防,但这一差异被一级预防人群较低的基线风险所弥补。这样的估计对于评估一级预防中的临床净收益很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号