...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Conflicting results between randomized trials and observational studies on the impact of proton pump inhibitors on cardiovascular events when coadministered with dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review
【24h】

Conflicting results between randomized trials and observational studies on the impact of proton pump inhibitors on cardiovascular events when coadministered with dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review

机译:与双重抗血小板治疗联合使用时,关于质子泵抑制剂对心血管事件影响的随机试验与观察性研究之间的结果不一致:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Discordant results have been reported on the effects of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for cardiovascular outcomes. We conducted a systematic review comparing the effectiveness and safety of concomitant use of PPIs and DAPT in the postdischarge treatment of unstable anginaon-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Methods and Results: We searched for clinical studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from 1995 to 2012. Reviewers screened and extracted data, assessed applicability and quality, and graded the strength of evidence. We performed meta-analyses of direct comparisons when outcomes and follow-up periods were comparable. Thirty-five studies were eligible. Five (4 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational) assessed the effect of omeprazole when added to DAPT; the other 30 (observational) assessed the effect of PPIs as a class when compared with no PPIs. Random-effects meta-analyses of the studies assessing PPIs as a class consistently reported higher event rates in patients receiving PPIs for various clinical outcomes at 1 year (composite ischemic end points, all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, stroke, revascularization, and stent thrombosis). However, the results from randomized controlled trials evaluating omeprazole compared with placebo showed no difference in ischemic outcomes, despite a reduction in upper gastrointestinal bleeding with omeprazole. Conclusions: Large, well-conducted observational studies of PPIs and randomized controlled trials of omeprazole seem to provide conflicting results for the effect of PPIs on cardiovascular outcomes when coadministered with DAPT. Prospective trials that directly compare pharmacodynamic parameters and clinical events among specific PPI agents in patients with unstable anginaon-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with DAPT are warranted.
机译:背景:关于同时使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)对心血管结局的影响,报道了不一致的结果。我们进行了系统评价,比较了同时使用PPI和DAPT在不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者出院后治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法和结果:我们检索了1995年至2012年在MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库中的临床研究。评价者筛选并提取了数据,评估了适用性和质量,并对证据的强度进行了分级。当结果和随访期间具有可比性时,我们进行了直接比较的荟萃分析。共有35项研究符合条件。五项(4项随机对照试验和1项观察性)评估了奥美拉唑在DAPT中的疗效;其他30个(观察性)将PPI的效果与没有PPI的效果进行了比较。评估PPI作为一类研究的随机效应荟萃分析一致报告,接受PPI的患者在1年内因各种临床结果(综合缺血终点,全因死亡率,非致死性MI,中风,血运重建和支架)的事件发生率更高血栓形成)。然而,尽管使用奥美拉唑减少了上消化道出血,但评估奥美拉唑与安慰剂相比的随机对照试验结果显示缺血结果无差异。结论:与DAPT并用时,大型,进行良好的PPI观察研究和奥美拉唑的随机对照试验似乎为PPI对心血管预后的影响提供了矛盾的结果。必须进行前瞻性试验,直接比较使用DAPT治疗的不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中特定PPI药物之间的药效学参数和临床事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号