首页> 外文期刊>Journal for the scientific study of religion >New Age, Religiosity, and Traditionalism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
【24h】

New Age, Religiosity, and Traditionalism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

机译:新时代,宗教和传统主义:跨文化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

New Age is a phenomenon that requires study for understanding both spirituality and the nature of contemporary society (Hanegraaff 2005; Heelas 1996; Kubiak 2005). Efforts to study New Age phenomenon are accompanied by some lack of clarity about its limits; some theorists even regard attempts to define New Age as essentially futile (Lewis 1992). Most influential authors focus on subjective self-awareness and the individual experiential dimensions of New Age (Bochinger 1994; Hanegraaff 2005; Knoblauch 1989; Melton 1992a; Moerth 1989; Siqueira 1999; Tucker 2002). They also stress that "New Age strongly favours a holistic-interconnected, essentially the same, basically unified-outlook" (Heelas 1996:33; Hanegraaff 2005; see also Siqueira 1999). In addition, emphasis is given to the coming of a new era, which brings about the positive values man has been seeking for millennia (Brown 1997; Burridge 1971; Radoani 2005), as well as to the social criticism and counterculture aspects of New Age (Heelas 1996:87-88; Hoellinger 2004; Stolz and Sanchez 2005).
机译:新时代是一种现象,需要进行研究才能理解灵性和当代社会的本质(Hanegraaff 2005; Heelas 1996; Kubiak 2005)。研究新时代现象的努力伴随着对它的局限性缺乏清晰的认识。一些理论家甚至认为试图将新时代定义为实质上是徒劳的(Lewis 1992)。大多数有影响力的作者关注主观自我意识和新时代的个体体验维度(Bochinger 1994; Hanegraaff 2005; Knoblauch 1989; Melton 1992a; Moerth 1989; Siqueira 1999; Tucker 2002)。他们还强调,“新时代强烈支持整体互连,基本相同,基本统一的外观”(Heelas 1996:33; Hanegraaff 2005;另见Siqueira 1999)。此外,重点是新时代的到来,它带来了人们一直追求的千年的积极价值(Brown 1997; Burridge 1971; Radoani 2005),以及新时代的社会批评和反文化方面。 (Heelas 1996:87-88; Hoellinger 2004; Stolz和Sanchez 2005)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号