首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:接受通气支持的早产儿常规吗啡输注:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) undergo a variety of painful procedures and stressful events. Because the effect of continuous morphine infusion in preterm neonates has not been investigated systematically, there is confusion regarding whether morphine should be used routinely in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of continuous intravenous morphine infusion on pain responses, incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and poor neurologic outcome (severe IVH, periventricular leukomalacia, or death). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between December 2000 and October 2002 in 2 level III NICUs in the Netherlands of 150 newborns who had received ventilatory support (inclusion criteria: postnatal age younger than 3 days and ventilation for less than 8 hours; exclusion criteria: severe asphyxia, severe IVH, major congenital malformations, and administration of neuromuscular blockers). INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous morphine (100 microg/kg and 10 microg/kg per hour) or placebo infusion was given for 7 days (or less because of clinical necessity in several cases). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect of morphine, as assessed using validated scales; the effect of morphine on the incidence of IVH; and poor neurologic outcome. RESULTS: The analgesic effect did not differ between the morphine and placebo groups, judging from the following median (interquartile range) pain scores: Premature Infant Pain Profile, 10.1 (8.2-11.6) vs 10.0 (8.2-12.0) (P =.94); Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, 4.8 (3.7-6.0) vs 4.8 (3.2-6.0) (P =.58); and visual analog scale, 2.8 (2.0-3.9) vs 2.6 (1.8-4.3) (P =.14), respectively. Routine morphine infusion decreased the incidence of IVH (23% vs 40%, P =.04) but did not influence poor neurologic outcome (10% vs 16%, P =.66). In addition, analyses were adjusted for the use of additional open-label morphine (27% of morphine group vs 40% of placebo group, P =.10). CONCLUSIONS:Lack of a measurable analgesic effect and absence of a beneficial effect on poor neurologic outcome do not support the routine use of morphine infusions as a standard of care in preterm newborns who have received ventilatory support. Follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of morphine infusions on the neurobehavioral outcomes of prematurity.
机译:背景:入院的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)经历了各种各样的痛苦过程和压力事件。由于尚未系统地研究连续吗啡输注在早产儿中的作用,因此在这种情况下是否应常规使用吗啡存在困惑。目的:评估连续静脉内吗啡输注对疼痛反应,脑室内出血(IVH)的发生率和不良神经系统预后(严重IVH,脑室白细胞软化或死亡)的影响。设计,地点和患者:2000年12月至2002年10月在荷兰的2个三级NICU中对150名接受通气支持的新生儿进行了一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验(纳入标准:出生后3岁以下的婴儿)天数和通气时间少于8小时;排除标准:严重窒息,严重IVH,主要先天性畸形和给予神经肌肉阻滞剂)。干预:静脉使用吗啡(每小时100微克/千克和每小时10微克/千克)或安慰剂输注7天(或由于某些情况下的临床必要性而减少)。主要观察指标:使用经验证的量表评估吗啡的镇痛作用。吗啡对IVH发病率的影响;和不良的神经系统预后。结果:吗啡组和安慰剂组的镇痛效果没有差异,从以下中位(四分位间距)疼痛评分来看:婴儿早产儿疼痛曲线,分别为10.1(8.2-11.6)和10.0(8.2-12.0)(P = .94) );新生儿婴儿疼痛量表,4.8(3.7-6.0)对4.8(3.2-6.0)(P = .58);和视觉模拟量表,分别为2.8(2.0-3.9)和2.6(1.8-4.3)(P = .14)。常规吗啡输注降低了IVH的发生率(23%vs 40%,P = .04),但未影响不良的神经系统预后(10%vs 16%,P = .66)。此外,对使用其他开放标签吗啡的分析进行了调整(吗啡组为27%,安慰剂组为40%,P = .10)。结论:缺乏可测量的镇痛作用以及对不良神经系统结局没有有益作用,不支持在接受通气支持的早产儿中常规使用吗啡输注作为护理标准。需要随访以评估吗啡输注对早产神经行为预后的长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号