...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal for the scientific study of religion >Critical Whiteness Theories and the Evangelical'Race Problem':Extending Emerson and Smith's Divided by Faith
【24h】

Critical Whiteness Theories and the Evangelical'Race Problem':Extending Emerson and Smith's Divided by Faith

机译:批判性的白度理论和福音派的“种族问题”:扩大了爱默生和史密斯的信仰划分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In their 2000 book, Divided by Faith, Michael Emerson and Christian Smith use the case of evangelical Christiansto demonstrate how uncompromising individualist ideals get in the way of clear thinking and decisive action aboutracial inequalities in contemporary American society. We use insights developed from whiteness studies andcritical race theory to sharpen and further extend this analysis. More specifically, we suggest: (1) that anti-blackstereotypes may be subtler, more pervasive, and more functionally necessary than Emerson and Smith assume;and (2) that the individualistic ideals Emerson and Smith focus on are not race neutral but, instead, are partof a taken-for-granted and vigorously defended majority white culture and identity. These points are developedthrough a theoretical reconstruction of Emerson and Smith's argument and a reevaluation of their methodologicalapproach and data. Finally, we present data from a recent national survey of race and religion in American lifethat provide preliminary quantitative support for our revisionist claims.
机译:迈克尔·爱默生(Michael Emerson)和克里斯汀·史密斯(Christian Smith)在其2000年的《信仰划分》一书中,使用福音派克里斯汀斯托的案例,证明了不妥协的个人主义理想如何通过对当代美国社会中种族不平等的清晰思考和决定性行动来解决。我们使用从白度研究和临界种族理论中获得的见解来加强并进一步扩展此分析。更具体地说,我们建议:(1)与爱默生和史密斯的假设相比,反黑名单的刻板印象可能更微妙,更普遍并且在功能上更必要;以及(2)爱默生和史密斯关注的个人主义理想并非种族中立,而是,是已获准并大力捍卫多数白人文化和身份的一部分。这些观点是通过对艾默生和史密斯论点的理论重构以及对他们的方法论方法和数据的重新评估而得出的。最后,我们提供了来自最近对美国生活中的种族和宗教进行的全国性调查的数据,这些数据为我们的修正主义者的主张提供了初步的定量支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号