首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization.
【24h】

Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization.

机译:住院后1年死亡率的预后指标的开发和验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: For many elderly patients, an acute medical illness requiring hospitalization is followed by a progressive decline, resulting in high rates of mortality in this population during the year following discharge. However, few prognostic indices have focused on predicting posthospital mortality in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prognostic index for 1 year mortality of older adults after hospital discharge using information readily available at discharge. DESIGN: Data analyses derived from 2 prospective studies with 1-year of follow-up, conducted in 1993 through 1997. SETTING AND PATIENTS: We developed the prognostic index in 1495 patients aged at least 70 years who were discharged from a general medical service at a tertiary care hospital (mean age, 81 years; 67% female) and validated it in 1427 patients discharged from a separate community teaching hospital (mean age, 79 years; 61% female). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prediction of 1-year mortality using risk factors such as demographic characteristics, activities of daily living (ADL) dependency, comorbid conditions, length of hospital stay, and laboratory measurements. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, 6 independent risk factors for mortality were identified and weighted using logistic regression: male sex (1 point); number of dependent ADLs at discharge (1-4 ADLs, 2 points; all 5 ADLs, 5 points); congestive heart failure (2 points); cancer (solitary, 3 points; metastatic, 8 points); creatinine level higher than 3.0 mg/dL (265 micromol/L) (2 points); and low albumin level (3.0-3.4 g/dL, 1 point; <3.0 g/dL, 2 points). Several variables associated with 1-year mortality in bivariable analyses, such as age and dementia, were not independently associated with mortality after adjustment for functional status. We calculated risk scores for patients by adding the points of each independent risk factor present. In the derivation cohort, 1-year mortality was 13% in the lowest-risk group (0-1 point), 20% in the group with 2 or 3 points, 37% in the group with 4 to 6 points, and 68% in the highest-risk group (>6 points). In the validation cohort, 1-year mortality was 4% in the lowest-risk group, 19% in the group with 2 or 3 points, 34% in the group with 4 to 6 points, and 64% in the highest-risk group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the point system was 0.75 in the derivation cohort and 0.79 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our prognostic index, which used 6 risk factors known at discharge and a simple additive point system to stratify medical patients 70 years or older according to 1-year mortality after hospitalization, had good discrimination and calibration and generalized well in an independent sample of patients at a different site. These characteristics suggest that our index may be useful for clinical care and risk adjustment.
机译:背景:对于许多老年患者而言,需要住院治疗的急性内科疾病继而逐渐下降,导致出院后这一年该人群的死亡率很高。然而,很少有预后指标集中于预测老年人的院后死亡率。目的:利用出院时容易获得的信息,开发和验证老年人出院后一年死亡率的预后指标。设计:数据分析来自1993年至1997年进行的2项为期1年随访的前瞻性研究。设置和患者:我们为1495名年龄至少70岁的患者提供了预后指数,这些患者在70岁时接受了常规医疗服务一家三级医院(平均年龄81岁;女性67%),并在另一所社区教学医院出院的1427名患者中进行了验证(平均年龄79岁;女性61%)。主要观察指标:使用危险因素,例如人口统计学特征,日常生活活动(ADL)依赖性,合并症,住院时间和实验室检查,对1年死亡率进行预测。结果:在派生队列中,使用logistic回归分析确定了6个独立的死亡危险因素并加权:男性(1分);男性(1分);男性(1分)。放电时相关ADL的数量(1-4个ADL,2点;所有5个ADL,5点);充血性心力衰竭(2分);癌症(单发3分;转移8分);肌酐水平高于3.0 mg / dL(265 micromol / L)(2分);低白蛋白水平(3.0-3.4 g / dL,1分; <3.0 g / dL,2分)。在双变量分析中,与1年死亡率相关的几个变量,例如年龄和痴呆症,在调整了功能状态后并没有独立地与死亡率相关。我们通过将每个存在的独立危险因素的分数相加来计算患者的危险分数。在派生队列中,最低风险组(0-1分)的1年死亡率为13%,2或3分的组为20%,4-6分的组为37%,68%最高风险组(> 6分)。在验证队列中,最低风险组的1年死亡率为4%,2或3分的组为19%,4-6分的组为34%,最高风险组为64% 。点系统的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积在派生队列中为0.75,在验证队列中为0.79。结论:我们的预后指标使用出院时已知的6个危险因素和简单的累加积分系统根据住院后的1年死亡率将70岁或以上的医学患者分层,具有良好的辨别力和校正能力,并且在独立的不同地点的病人。这些特征表明我们的指数可能对临床护理和风险调整有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号