首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators on airlines.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators on airlines.

机译:航空公司的自动体外除颤器的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Installation of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) on passenger aircraft has been shown to improve survival of cardiac arrest in that setting, but the cost-effectiveness of such measures has not been proven. OBJECTIVE: To examine the costs and effectiveness of several different options for AED deployment in the US commercial air transportation system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of a strategy of full deployment on all aircraft as well as several strategies of partial deployment only on larger aircraft, compared with a baseline strategy of no AEDs on aircraft (but training flight attendants in basic life support) for a hypothetical cohort of persons experiencing cardiac arrest aboard US commercial aircraft. Estimates for costs and outcomes were obtained from the medical literature, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Air Transport Association of America, a population-based cohort of Medicare patients, AED manufacturers, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted survival after cardiac arrest; costs of AED deployment on aircraft and of medical care for cardiac arrest survivors. RESULTS: Adding AEDs on passenger aircraft with more than 200 passengers would cost
机译:背景:已经证明在客机上安装自动体外除颤器(AED)可以改善这种情况下心脏骤停的存活率,但是这种措施的成本效益尚未得到证实。目的:研究在美国商业航空运输系统中部署AED的几种不同选择的成本和有效性。设计,设置和主题:与在飞机上没有AED的基准策略(但训练乘务员)相比,在所有飞机上完全部署策略以及仅在较大飞机上部分部署的几种策略的决策和成本效益分析在基本生命支持中),以假设的一群人在美国商用飞机上经历心脏骤停。从医学文献,联邦航空管理局,美国航空运输协会,以医疗保健患者为基础的人群队列,AED制造商和劳工统计局获得了成本和结果的估计值。主要观察指标:心脏骤停后质量调整的生存率。在飞机上部署AED以及心脏骤停幸存者的医疗费用。结果:在载客量超过200人的客机上添加自动体外除颤器将花费

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号