首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework (see comments)
【24h】

Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework (see comments)

机译:改善医师对诊断测试的使用的技术:新的概念框架(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To review the published literature on interventions aimed at improving physicians' testing practices and propose methodologic standards for these studies and to review selected studies using the PRECEDE framework, a behavioral model that helps categorize interventions based on which behavioral factors are being affected. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and HEALTHStar databases were searched for the years 1966 to January 1, 1998, for English-language articles pertaining to diagnostic testing behavior; bibliographies were scanned to identify articles of potential interest; and researchers in health services, health behavior, and behavior modification were contacted for proprietary and other unpublished articles. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 102 articles were identified that described the results of interventions aimed at changing physicians' testing practices. We included the 49 studies that compared diagnostic testing practices in intervention and control groups. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently reviewed each article in a blinded fashion using a standard data collection form to obtain a methodologic score and to abstract the key elements of each intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: On a 38-point methodologic criteria scale, the mean +/- SD score was 13+/-4.4. The desired behavior change was reported in the intervention group in 37 (76%) of 49 studies. Twenty-four (86%) of 28 interventions targeted at many behavioral factors were successful, while 13 (62%) of 21 studies aimed at a single behavioral factor were successful (P=.12). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of interventions to improve physicians' testing practices reported in the literature claimed success, with interventions based on multiple behavioral factors trending toward being more successful. While methodologic flaws hamper drawing strong conclusions from this literature, application of a behavioral framework appears to be useful in explaining interventions that are successful and can facilitate interpretation of intervention results.
机译:目的:回顾有关旨在改善医师测试实践的干预措施的文献,并提出这些研究的方法学标准,并使用PRECEDE框架对选定的研究进行回顾,该模型是一种行为模型,可根据受影响的行为因素对干预措施进行分类。资料来源:检索1966年至1998年1月1日的MEDLINE,EMBASE和HEALTHStar数据库,以查找与诊断测试行为有关的英语文章;扫描书目以识别可能感兴趣的文章;并与卫生服务,健康行为和行为改变方面的研究人员联系,以获取专有和其他未发表的文章。研究选择:总共鉴定了102篇文章,描述了旨在改变医生的测试实践的干预措施的结果。我们纳入了49项研究,这些研究比较了干预组和对照组的诊断测试实践。数据提取:两名研究人员使用标准数据收集表以盲目方式独立审查了每篇文章,以获取方法学得分并提取每种干预措施的关键要素。数据综合:在38分方法学标准量表上,平均+/- SD评分为13 +/- 4.4。干预组49项研究中有37例(76%)报告了所需的行为改变。针对多种行为因素的28项干预措施中有二十四项(86%)成功,而针对单一行为因素的21项研究中有13项(62%)成功(P = .12)。结论:文献中报道的大多数改善医师测试实践的干预措施都取得了成功,而基于多种行为因素的干预措施则趋向于更加成功。尽管方法上的缺陷阻碍了从这些文献中得出强有力的结论,但行为框架的应用似乎在解释成功的干预措施方面很有用,并且可以促进对干预结果的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号