首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis.

机译:术后硬膜外镇痛的疗效:一项荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral opioids for postoperative pain control remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia vs parenteral opioids, the primary alternative technique. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified primarily by searching the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to April 25, 2002) and other sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were a comparison of epidural therapy vs parenteral opioids for postoperative analgesia, measurement of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale, randomization of patients to either therapy, and adult patients (> or =18 years). A total of 1404 abstracts were identified, 100 of which met all inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Each article was reviewed and data extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures as needed. Weighted mean pain scores, weighted mean differences in pain score, and weighted incidences of complications were determined by using a fixed-effect model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Epidural analgesia provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids (mean [SE], 19.40 mm [0.17] vs 29.40 mm [0.20] on the VAS; P<.001). When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on each postoperative day (P<.001 for each day after surgery). For all types of surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioid analgesia (P<.001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thoracic surgery (weighted mean difference, 0.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 1.5 mm; P =.12). The complication rates were lower than expected for nausea or vomiting and pruritus but comparable with existing data for lower extremity motor block. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment, provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids.
机译:背景:硬膜外镇痛是否比肠胃外阿片类药物更好的术后疼痛控制方法尚存争议。目的:系统评价术后硬膜外镇痛与肠胃外阿片类药物(主要的替代技术)的疗效。数据来源:研究主要是通过搜索美国国家医学图书馆的PubMed数据库(1966年至2002年4月25日)和其他与术后硬膜外镇痛有关的研究来确定的。研究选择:纳入标准是硬膜外治疗与肠胃外类阿片类药物用于术后镇痛的比较,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)或数字评分量表测量疼痛,将患者随机分配至任一疗法和成年患者(>或= 18岁)。总共鉴定了1404个摘要,其中100个符合所有纳入标准。数据提取:每篇文章均经过审查,并根据需要从表格,文本中提取数据,或从图中推断数据。使用固定效应模型确定加权平均疼痛评分,加权平均疼痛评分差异和加权并发症发生率。数据综合:硬膜外镇痛比肠胃外阿片类药物提供更好的术后镇痛效果(VAS平均[SE]为19.40 mm [0.17],而VAS为29.40 mm [0.20]; P <.001)。按术后当天分析,硬膜外镇痛效果优于术后每天的肠胃外阿片类药物(术后每天P <.001)。对于所有类型的手术和疼痛评估,与非肠道类阿片类镇痛相比,各种形式的硬膜外镇痛均具有更好的术后镇痛效果(所有P均<0.001),但胸膜硬膜外镇痛与阿片类药物在胸外科手术后的镇痛效果较差(加权)平均差0.6毫米; 95%置信区间-0.3至1.5毫米; P = 0.12)。并发症发生率低于预期的恶心,呕吐和瘙痒,但与下肢运动阻滞的现有数据相当。结论:硬膜外镇痛,无论使用何种镇痛药,导管放置的位置以及疼痛评估的类型和时间,均比肠胃外阿片类药物提供更好的术后镇痛效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号