首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery (see comments)
【24h】

The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery (see comments)

机译:管理式医疗保险与使用低死亡率医院进行CABG手术之间的关系(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Explicit information about the quality of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been available for nearly a decade in New York State; however, the extent to which managed care insurance plans direct enrollees to the lowest-mortality CABG surgery hospitals remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportion of patients with managed care insurance and fee-for-service (FFS) insurance who undergo CABG surgery at lower-mortality hospitals. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of CABG surgery discharges from 1993 to 1996, using New York Department of Health databases and multivariate analysis to estimate the use of lower-mortality hospitals by patients with different types of health insurance. SETTING: Cardiac surgical centers in New York, of which 14 were classified as lower-mortality hospitals (mean rate, 2.1%) and 17 were classified as higher-mortality hospitals (mean rate, 3.2%). PATIENTS: A total of 58,902 adults older than 17 years who were hospitalized for CABG surgery. Patients were excluded if their CABG surgery was combined with any valve procedure or left ventricular aneurysm resection or if they were younger than 65 years and enrolled in Medicare FFS or Medicare managed care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Probability of a patient receiving CABG surgery at a lower-mortality hospital. RESULTS: Compared with patients with private FFS insurance (n = 18,905), patients with private managed care insurance (n=7169) and Medicare managed care insurance (n=880) were less likely to receive CABG surgery at a lower-mortality hospital (relative risk [RR] of surgery at a lower-mortality hospital compared with patients with private FFS insurance, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.81; P<.001; and RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.70; P<.001, respectively, after controlling for multiple potential confounding factors). Patients with Medicare FFS insurance used lower-mortality hospitals at rates more similar to those with private FFS insurance (n = 31,948; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98; P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in New York State with private managed care and Medicare managed care insurance were significantly less likely to use lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery compared with patients with private FFS insurance.
机译:背景:关于冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)手术质量的明确信息在纽约州已有近十年的历史了。但是,管理式医疗保险计划将入选者定向到死亡率最低的CABG手术医院的程度仍然未知。目的:比较在低死亡率医院接受CABG手术的管理式医疗保险和有偿服务费(FFS)保险患者的比例。设计:一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为1993年至1996年间CABG手术出院的患者,该研究使用纽约州卫生部的数据库和多变量分析来估算具有不同类型健康保险的患者对低死亡率医院的使用情况。地点:纽约的心脏外科中心,其中14家被归类为低死亡率医院(平均率为2.1%),而17家被归类为高死亡率的医院(平均率为3.2%)。患者:总共58902名年龄在17岁以上的成年人因CABG手术而住院。如果将CABG手术与任何瓣膜手术或左心室动脉瘤切除术相结合或年龄小于65岁并参加Medicare FFS或Medicare管理的治疗,则将患者排除在外。主要观察指标:在一家死亡率较低的医院接受CABG手术的患者的可能性。结果:与拥有私人FFS保险的患者(n = 18,905)相比,拥有私人管理的医疗保险(n = 7169)和Medicare管理的医疗保险(n = 880)的患者在低死亡率医院接受CABG手术的可能性较小(与拥有私人FFS保险的患者相比,低死亡率医院手术的相对危险度[RR]为0.77; 95%的置信区间[CI]为0.74-0.81; P <.001; RR为0.61; 95%CI为0.54 -0.70; P <.001,分别控制多个潜在的混杂因素后)。拥有Medicare FFS保险的患者使用更低死亡率的医院的比率与使用私人FFS保险的比率更高(n = 31,948; RR,0.95; 95%CI,0.91-0.98; P = .004)。结论:与拥有私人FFS保险的患者相比,拥有私人管理的医疗和Medicare管理的医疗保险的纽约州患者使用低死亡率医院进行CABG手术的可能性大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号