首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy (see comments)
【24h】

Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy (see comments)

机译:颈动脉内膜切除术的适应症,结局和提供者数量(见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: While trials have demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy is superior to best medical therapy, most recently among asymptomatic patients, uses and outcomes of the procedure in more representative settings have not been established. OBJECTIVES: To profile the use and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in a representative sample of Ohio's Medicare beneficiaries and to examine the relationships between provider-specific procedural volumes and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort using Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files supplemented by detailed reviews of medical records on a random sample of patients. SETTING: Ohio hospitals performing carotid endarterectomy. PATIENTS: A random sample of 678 charts of the 4120 non-health maintenance organization Medicare beneficiaries who underwent carotid endarterectomy between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nonfatal stroke or death within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: The reviewed patients were similar to all eligible patients in sociodemographic characteristics and 30-day mortality rates. Among the 678 patients, indications for surgery were asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 167 (24.6%), transient ischemic attack in 294 (43.4%), completed stroke in 62 (9.1%), and nonspecific symptoms in 155 (22.9%). Thirty-two patients (4.7%) died or suffered nonfatal strokes by 30 days postoperatively. In univariate analyses, rates varied by hospital volume (P=.004) but not surgeons' volume (P=.47), although power to detect this difference was limited. Patients at higher- and lower-volume hospitals had similar indications and distributions of comorbidities. In analyses controlling for indications, comorbid conditions, and surgeon's volume, being operated on in a higher-volume hospital conferred a 71% reduction in risk for 30-day stroke or death (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.69; P=.006). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half (47.5%) of the carotid endarterectomies among Ohio's Medicare population are performed on persons who are asymptomatic or who have nonspecific symptoms. These results highlight the importance of identifying patients and providers having the most favorable outcome profiles. The higher rate of adverse outcomes observed in lower-volume hospitals deserves further investigation, as it does not appear to be due to differences in patient selection.
机译:背景:尽管试验表明颈动脉内膜切除术优于最佳药物治疗,但最近在无症状患者中,尚没有确定在更具代表性的情况下该手术的用途和结果。目的:在俄亥俄州医疗保险受益人的代表性样本中概述颈动脉内膜切除术的使用和结局,并检查提供者特定的手术量与患者结局之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列使用Medicare Provider Analysis and Review文件,辅以对患者随机样本的病历进行详细审查。地点:俄亥俄州的医院进行颈动脉内膜切除术。患者:1993年7月1日至1994年6月30日期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术的4120个非健康维持组织医疗保险受益人的678个图表的随机抽样。主要观察指标:手术后30天内非致命性中风或死亡。结果:回顾的患者在社会人口统计学特征和30天死亡率方面与所有合格患者相似。在678例患者中,手术指征为无症状性颈动脉狭窄167例(24.6%),短暂性脑缺血发作294例(43.4%),中风62例(9.1%)和非特异性症状155例(22.9%)。术后30天有32例患者(4.7%)死亡或发生了非致命性中风。在单变量分析中,尽管因医院的大小而异,但因医院规模(P = .004)而变化的比率却没有变化(P = .47),但比率因医院的大小而异(P = .47)。规模较大和规模较小的医院的患者具有相似的适应症和合并症分布。在控制适应症,合并症和外科医生量的分析中,在较大规模的医院中进行手术,可使30天中风或死亡的风险降低71%(赔率,0.29; 95%置信区间,0.12-0.69) ; P = .006)。结论:在俄亥俄州的Medicare人群中,近一半(47.5%)的颈动脉内膜切除术是对无症状或无特定症状的人进行的。这些结果突出了确定具有最有利结果的患者和提供者的重要性。在较小规模的医院中观察到较高的不良结局率值得进一步研究,因为这似乎不是由于患者选择的差异而引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号