首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis.

机译:超低出生体重和早产儿的围产期区域化:一项荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of published literature (1976-May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants < or = 1500 g or < or = 32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION: For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.
机译:背景:30多年来,围产期区域划分指南建议在高度专业化的医院(通常被指定为III级医院)出生极低出生体重(VLBW)的婴儿。尽管提出了这些建议,但某些地区在下级医院出生的VLBW婴儿比例仍然很高。目的:评估已发表的有关VLBW和极早产儿(VPTW)的出生水平与新生儿或出院前死亡率之间的关联性的数据。数据来源:系统搜索MEDLINE,CINAHL,EMBASE和PubMed数据库中已发表的文献(1976年-2010年5月),以及手动搜索参考文献列表。研究选择和数据提取:有41篇出版物符合先验​​纳入标准(随机对照试验,队列研究和病例对照研究,测量了≤1500 g或≤32周活产婴儿的新生儿或出院前死亡率在III级与较低级别的设备上交付)。配对的审阅者使用标准化表格独立评估出版物的收录和提取数据。差异由第三位审核者决定。 3位作者根据2个内容领域对出版物的质量进行了审查:混淆因素的调整和医院水平的描述。我们使用随机效应模型和未调整的合并死亡率进行了加权综合比值比(OR)的计算。数据综合:我们观察到VLBW婴儿(38%比23%;校正后的OR,1.62; 95%置信区间[CI],1.44-1.83)和VPT婴儿(15%比17%;校正后的OR,1.55)的死亡几率增加; 95%CI(1.21-1.98)出生于三级医院以外。当仅限于更高质量的证据时,获得了一致的结果(VLBW婴儿的死亡率为36%vs 21%;校正后的OR为1.60; 95%CI为1.33-1.92; VPT婴儿的死亡率为7%vs 12%;校正后的OR为1.42 ; 95%CI(1.06-1.88)和体重不足1000 g的婴儿(59%比32%;调整后的OR,1.80; 95%CI,1.31-2.46)。通过亚组分析研究特征没有发现显着差异。出版年份的元回归未显示出随时间的变化(斜率,0.00; P = 0.87)。结论:对于VLBW和VPT婴儿,在三级医院以外出生与新生儿或出院前死亡的可能性增加显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号