首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Prophylactic treatment of migraine with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Prophylactic treatment of migraine with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对偏头痛的预防性治疗:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: There is a paucity of effective, well-tolerated drugs available for migraine prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan is effective as a migraine-prophylactic drug. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study performed in a Norwegian neurological outpatient clinic from January 2001 to February 2002. PATIENTS: Sixty patients aged 18 to 65 years with 2 to 6 migraine attacks per month were recruited mainly from newspaper advertisements. INTERVENTIONS: A placebo run-in period of 4 weeks was followed by two 12-week treatment periods separated by 4 weeks of placebo washout. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive one 16-mg candesartan cilexetil tablet daily in the first treatment period followed by 1 placebo tablet daily in the second period. The remaining 30 received placebo followed by candesartan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was number of days with headache; secondary end points included hours with headache, days with migraine, hours with migraine, headache severity index, level of disability, doses of triptans, doses of analgesics, acceptability of treatment, days of sick leave, and quality-of-life variables on the Short Form 36 questionnaire. RESULTS: In a period of 12 weeks, the mean number of days with headache was 18.5 with placebo vs 13.6 with candesartan (P =.001) in the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 57). Some secondary end points also favored candesartan, including hours with headache (139 vs 95; P<.001), days with migraine (12.6 vs 9.0; P<.001), hours with migraine (92.2 vs 59.4; P<.001), headache severity index (293 vs 191; P<.001), level of disability (20.6 vs 14.1; P<.001) and days of sick leave (3.9 vs 1.4; P =.01), although there were no significant differences in health-related quality of life. The number of candesartan responders (reduction of > or =50% compared with placebo) was 18 (31.6%) of 57 for days with headache and 23 (40.4%) of 57 for days with migraine. Adverse events were similar in the 2 periods. CONCLUSION: In this study, the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan provided effective migraine prophylaxis, with a tolerability profile comparable with that of placebo.
机译:语境:很少有有效的,耐受性良好的药物可用于预防偏头痛。目的:确定使用血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦作为偏头痛预防药物是否有效。设计与地点:2001年1月至2002年2月在挪威神经科门诊进行的随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的交叉研究。患者:60名年龄在18至65岁,每月发作2至6次偏头痛的患者主要来自报纸广告。干预措施:安慰剂磨合期为4周,之后是两个12周的治疗期,相隔4周的安慰剂被冲洗掉。 30名患者被随机分配为在第一个治疗期间每天接受一剂16 mg坎地沙坦cilexetil片剂,然后在第二个时期中每天接受一剂安慰剂片剂。其余30名接受安慰剂,其次是坎地沙坦。主要观察指标:主要终点为头痛天数。次要终点包括头痛时数,偏头痛日数,偏头痛时数,头痛严重程度指数,残疾程度,曲坦类药物剂量,镇痛药剂量,治疗可接受性,病假天数以及生活质量变量简短表格36问卷。结果:在意向性治疗分析中,安慰剂组头痛的平均天数为18.5天,坎地沙坦的平均头痛天数为13.6天(P = .001)(n = 57)。一些次要终点也偏爱坎地沙坦,包括头痛时数(139 vs 95; P <.001),偏头痛天数(12.6 vs 9.0; P <.001),偏头痛时数(92.2 vs 59.4; P <.001)。 ,头痛严重程度指数(293 vs 191; P <.001),残障程度(20.6 vs 14.1; P <.001)和病假天数(3.9 vs 1.4; P = .01),尽管没有显着差异健康相关的生活质量。坎地沙坦应答者的数量(与安慰剂相比减少>或= 50%)在头痛时为57天的18(31.6%),在偏头痛时为57天的23(40.4%)。这两个时期的不良事件相似。结论:在这项研究中,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦可有效预防偏头痛,其耐受性与安慰剂相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号