首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Information leaflet and antibiotic prescribing strategies for acute lower respiratory tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Information leaflet and antibiotic prescribing strategies for acute lower respiratory tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:急性下呼吸道感染的信息传单和抗生素处方策略:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Acute lower respiratory tract infection is the most common condition treated in primary care. Many physicians still prescribe antibiotics; however, systematic reviews of the use of antibiotics are small and have diverse conclusions. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of 3 prescribing strategies and an information leaflet for acute lower respiratory tract infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized controlled trial conducted from August 18, 1998, to July 30, 2003, of 807 patients presenting in a primary care setting with acute uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were assigned to 1 of 6 groups by a factorial design: leaflet or no leaflet and 1 of 3 antibiotic groups (immediate antibiotics, no offer of antibiotics, and delayed antibiotics). INTERVENTION: Three strategies, immediate antibiotics (n = 262), a delayed antibiotic prescription (n = 272), and no offer of antibiotics (n = 273), were prescribed. Approximately half of each group received an information leaflet (129 for immediate antibiotics, 136 for delayed antibiotic prescription, and 140 for no antibiotics). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom duration and severity. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients (70%) returned complete diaries and 78 (10%) provided information about both symptom duration and severity. Cough rated at least "a slight problem" lasted a mean of 11.7 days (25% of patients had a cough lasting > or =17 days). An information leaflet had no effect on the main outcomes. Compared with no offer of antibiotics, other strategies did not alter cough duration (delayed, 0.75 days; 95% confidence intervals [CI], -0.37 to 1.88; immediate, 0.11 days; 95% CI, -1.01 to 1.24) or other primary outcomes. Compared with the immediate antibiotic group, slightly fewer patients in the delayed and control groups used antibiotics (96%, 20%, and 16%, respectively; P<.001), fewer patients were "very satisfied" (86%, 77%, and 72%, respectively; P = .005), and fewer patients believed in the effectiveness of antibiotics (75%, 40%, and 47%, respectively; P<.001). There were lower reattendances within a month with antibiotics (mean attendances for no antibiotics, 0.19; delayed, 0.12; and immediate, 0.11; P = .04) and higher attendance with a leaflet (mean attendances for no leaflet, 0.11; and leaflet, 0.17; P = .02). CONCLUSION: No offer or a delayed offer of antibiotics for acute uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection is acceptable, associated with little difference in symptom resolution, and is likely to considerably reduce antibiotic use and beliefs in the effectiveness of antibiotics.
机译:背景:急性下呼吸道感染是基层医疗中最常见的疾病。许多医生仍然开抗生素。但是,对抗生素使用的系统评价很少,并且得出不同的结论。目的:评估3种处方策略和信息单张对急性下呼吸道感染的有效性。设计,地点和患者:1998年8月18日至2003年7月30日进行的一项随机对照试验,对807名就诊为急性单纯性下呼吸道感染的初级保健患者进行了研究。通过析因设计将患者分为6组中的1组:小叶或无小叶,3个抗生素组中的1个(即刻使用抗生素,不提供抗生素和延迟使用抗生素)。干预:规定了三种策略,即刻使用抗生素(n = 262),延迟抗生素处方(n = 272)和不提供抗生素(n = 273)。每个小组中大约有一半收到了信息单张(129份即时抗生素,136份延迟抗生素处方和140份无抗生素)。主要观察指标:症状持续时间和严重程度。结果:共有562例患者(70%)返回完整日记,其中78例(10%)提供了有关症状持续时间和严重程度的信息。至少“轻微问题”的咳嗽平均持续11.7天(25%的患者咳嗽持续>或= 17天)。信息传单对主要结果没有影响。与不提供抗生素相比,其他策略未改变咳嗽持续时间(延迟0.75天; 95%置信区间[CI],-0.37至1.88;即刻,0.11天; 95%CI,-1.01至1.24)或其他主要方法结果。与即刻抗生素组相比,延迟和对照组使用抗生素的患者略少(分别为96%,20%和16%; P <.001),对“非常满意”的患者更少(86%,77%) ,分别为72%和32%(P = .005),相信抗生素有效的患者较少(分别为75%,40%和47%; P <.001)。一个月内使用抗生素的出勤率较低(无抗生素的平均出勤率,为0.19;延迟率为0.12;立即使用的出勤率,为0.11; P = .04),并且有传单的出勤率较高(无出诊率,平均出勤率为0.11;和0.17; P = .02)。结论:对于急性并发的下呼吸道感染,抗生素的提供或延迟提供是不可接受的,其症状的解决方法差异很小,并且可能会大大减少抗生素的使用和对抗生素有效性的信念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号