首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure.
【24h】

Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure.

机译:坎地沙坦对心力衰竭患者非致命性心肌梗塞和心血管死亡的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), but it is not known whether angiotensin receptor blockers have the same effect. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program, a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling patients (mean age, 66 [SD, 11] years) with New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms who were randomly allocated to receive candesartan (target dose, 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo given in addition to optimal therapy for heart failure. Patients were enrolled from March 1999 through March 2001. Of 7599 patients allocated, 4004 (53%) had experienced a previous MI, and 1808 (24%) currently had angina. At baseline, 3125 (41%) were receiving an ACE inhibitor; 4203 (55%), a beta-blocker;3153 (42%), a lipid-lowering drug; 4246 (56%), aspirin; and 6286 (83%), a diuretic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome of the present analysis was the composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI in patients with heart failure receiving candesartan or placebo. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 37.7 months, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced in the candesartan group (775 patients [20.4%]) vs the placebo group (868 [22.9%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96; P = .004; number needed to treat [NNT], 40). Nonfatal MI alone was also significantly reduced in the candesartan group (116 [3.1%]) vs the placebo group (148 [3.9%]) (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98; P = .03; NNT, 118). The secondary outcome of fatal MI, sudden death, or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced with candesartan (459 [12.1%]) vs placebo (522 [13.8%]) (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97; P = .02; NNT, 59). Risk reductions in cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI were similar across predetermined subgroups and the component CHARM trials. There was no impact on hospitalizations for unstable angina or coronary revascularization procedures with candesartan. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure, candesartan significantly reduces the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI.
机译:背景:血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可降低心肌梗塞(MI)的风险,但尚不清楚血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是否具有相同的作用。目的:评估血管紧张素受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦对心力衰竭患者心肌梗死及其他冠脉事件的影响。设计,地点和参与者:心力衰竭中的坎地沙坦:死亡率和发病率降低(CHARM)计划的评估,该研究是一项随机,安慰剂对照研究,纳入了纽约心脏地区的患者(平均年龄66 [SD,11]岁)除心力衰竭最佳治疗外,随机分配接受坎地沙坦(目标剂量,每天一次32毫克)或匹配安慰剂的II至IV级协会症状。自1999年3月至2001年3月登记的患者。在分配的7599名患者中,有4004名(53%)经历过先前的心梗,目前有1808名(24%)患有心绞痛。基线时,有3125(41%)位患者接受ACE抑制剂治疗; 4203(55%),一种β受体阻滞剂; 3153(42%),一种降脂药物;阿司匹林4246(56%); 6286(83%),利尿剂。主要观察指标:本分析的主要结果是接受坎地沙坦或安慰剂治疗的心力衰竭患者的心血管死亡或非致死性心肌梗死综合症。结果:在中位随访37.7个月期间,坎地沙坦组(775例患者[20.4%])比安慰剂组(868例[22.9%])显着降低了心血管死亡或非致命性心肌梗死的主要结局(危险比) [HR]为0.87; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.79-0.96; P = 0.004;治疗所需的数字[NNT]为40)。坎地沙坦组(116 [3.1%])相对于安慰剂组(148 [3.9%])单独的非致死性心肌梗死也显着减少(HR,0.77; 95%CI,0.60-0.98; P = .03; NNT,118 )。坎地沙坦(459 [12.1%])与安慰剂(522 [13.8%])相比,致命性MI,猝死或非致命性MI的继发结局显着降低(HR,0.86; 95%CI,0.75-0.97; P =。 02; NNT,59)。在预定的亚组和CHARM分量试验中,降低心血管死亡或非致死性心肌梗死的风险相似。不稳定的心绞痛或使用坎地沙坦的冠状动脉血运重建术对住院治疗没有影响。结论:在心力衰竭患者中,坎地沙坦显着降低了心血管死亡或非致死性心肌梗死综合结果的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号