首页> 外文期刊>JAMA surgery >Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: Results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry
【24h】

Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: Results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry

机译:损伤控制剖腹手术后肠瘘和腹部败血症的独立预测因子:前瞻性AAST开放腹部登记的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), and intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess (IAS) are major challenges for surgeons caring for patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma. OBJECTIVE To determine independent predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma, using the AAST Open Abdomen Registry. DESIGN The AAST Open Abdomen registry of patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy was used to identify patients who developed ECF, EAF, or IAS and to compare these patients with those without these complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare these groups of patients. Variables from univariate analyses differing at P < .20 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for ECF, EAF, or IAS. SETTING Fourteen level I trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS A total of 517 patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Complication of ECF, EAF, or IAS. RESULTS More patients in the ECF/EAF/IAS group than in the group without these complications underwent bowel resection (63 of 111 patients [57%] vs 133 of 406 patients [33%]; P < .001). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, the ECF/EAF/IAS group received more colloids (P < .03) and total fluids (P < .03) than did the group without these complications. The ECF/EAF/IAS group underwent almost twice as many abdominal reexplorations as did the group without these complications (mean [SD] number, 4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of ECF/EAF/IAS were a large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.56 [95%CI, 1.88-6.76]; P < .001), a total fluid intake at 48 hours of between 5 and 10 L (AOR, 2.11 [95%CI, 1.15-3.88]; P = .02)or more than 10 L (AOR, 1.93 [95%CI, 1.04-3.57]; P = .04), and an increasing number of reexplorations (AOR, 1.14 [95%CI, 1.06-1.21]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Large bowel resection, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an increasing number of abdominal reexplorations were statistically significant predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.
机译:重要肠外瘘(ECF),肠大肠瘘(EAF)和腹内脓毒症/脓肿(IAS)是外科医生照顾创伤后接受破损控制剖腹手术患者的主要挑战。目的使用AAST开放腹部登记系统确定外伤后进行损伤控制性剖腹手术患者的ECF,EAF或IAS的独立预测因子。设计采用损伤控制剖腹手术后腹部开放患者的AAST开放腹部登记系统,以鉴定发生ECF,EAF或IAS的患者,并将这些患者与没有这些并发症的患者进行比较。进行单因素分析以比较这些患者组。来自单变量分析的P≤0.2的变量被输入到逐步Logistic回归模型中,以识别ECF,EAF或IAS的独立风险因素。设置14个一级创伤中心。参与者共有517例在损伤控制性剖腹手术后开腹的患者。主要结果和措施ECF,EAF或IAS的并发症。结果ECF / EAF / IAS组比没有这些并发症的组进行肠切除术的患者多(111例患者中有63例[57%],而406例患者中有133例[33%]; P <.001)。在没有术后并发症的组中,ECF / EAF / IAS组在手术后的前48小时内接受的胶体(P <.03)和总体液(P <.03)较多。 ECF / EAF / IAS组的腹部再造几乎是没有这些并发症的组的两倍(平均[SD]数,4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P <.001)。经过多变量分析,ECF / EAF / IAS的独立预测因素是大肠切除术(校正比值比[AOR],3.56 [95%CI,1.88-6.76]; P <.001),在48小时时的总液体摄入量5至10 L(AOR,2.11 [95%CI,1.15-3.88]; P = .02)或大于10 L(AOR,1.93 [95%CI,1.04-3.57]; P = .04),以及越来越多的重新探索(AOR,1.14 [95%CI,1.06-1.21]; P <.001)。结论和相关性大肠切除术,大容量液体复苏术和增加的腹部探查次数是控制损伤性剖腹手术后开腹患者ECF,EAF或IAS的统计学显着预测指标。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号