...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of AAPOS: The official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus >Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures(c), Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.
【24h】

Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures(c), Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.

机译:使用Wright图形(c),Allen视力表和Snellen字母比较小儿弱视患者的视力水平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare and correlate the clinical performance of Wright figures(c) in visual acuity assessments of pediatric patients with amblyopia to those obtained through Allen cards and Snellen letters. Subjects and methods: Best-corrected visual acuity of 26 amblyopic children were measured with the Wright figures(c), Snellen letters, and isolated Allen optotypes, respectively. Amblyopia was defined as two lines of visual acuity difference or a visual acuity level of 20/30 or lower as determined by Snellen chart. The results were evaluated for statistical intergroup differences using the Wilks' Lambda multivariate analysis of variance and for correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient test. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 8.27 +/- 2.46 years (range: 5 to 15 years). The mean logMAR values for the Wright figures(c), Snellen letters, and Allen optotypes were 0.40 +/- 0.20, 0.47 +/- 0.23, and 0.29 +/- 0.28, respectively. When compared with Snellen letters, the Wright figures(c) correlated to a higher degree ( r = 0.46, P < 0.001) than Allen optotypes ( r = 0.67, P < 0.001). With a visual acuity of 20/40 or worse on Snellen letter testing, the sensitivity of Wright figures(c) and Allen cards in diagnosing amblyopic eyes was 87.0 and 56.5%, respectively ( P = 0.016). Conclusions: Wright figures(c), designed primarily to evaluate the vision in the preliterate pediatric population, correlate more closely to Snellen letters and have a higher rate of correctly identifying amblyopia than isolated Allen optotypes in pediatric patients.
机译:目的:比较和关联Wright图形(c)在小儿弱视患者视力评估中的临床表现与通过Allen卡和Snellen字母获得的临床表现。研究对象和方法:分别用Wright身材(c),Snellen字母和孤立的A​​llen视力表对26位弱视儿童的最佳矫正视力进行了测量。弱视定义为两行视力差异或视力图,根据Snellen图表确定为20/30或更低。使用Wilks's Lambda多变量方差分析评估结果的统计学差异,并使用Pearson相关系数检验评估相关性。结果:受试者的平均年龄为8.27 +/- 2.46岁(范围:5至15岁)。 Wright图(c),Snellen字母和Allen视标的平均logMAR值分别为0.40 +/- 0.20、0.47 +/- 0.23和0.29 +/- 0.28。与Snellen字母相比,Wright图形(c)的关联度高于Allen视标度(r = 0.67,P <0.001)(r = 0.46,P <0.001)。在Snellen字母测试中视力为20/40或更差时,Wright图形(c)和Allen卡在诊断弱视眼中的敏感性分别为87.0和56.5%(P = 0.016)。结论:Wright图(c)主要用于评估识字前儿童的视力,与Snellen字母的相关性更高,并且比孤立的Allen视力类型的儿童弱视率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号