首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Informal versus Formal: A Panel Data Analysis of Earnings Gaps in Madagascar
【24h】

Informal versus Formal: A Panel Data Analysis of Earnings Gaps in Madagascar

机译:非正式与正式:马达加斯加的收入差距的面板数据分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little is known about the informal sector's income structure vis-a-vis the formal sector, despite its predominant economic weight in developing countries. While most of the papers on this topic are drawn from (emerging) Latin American, Asian or some African countries, Madagascar represents an interesting case. So far, very few studies in general, even less so in Sub-Saharan Africa, used panel data to provide evidence of the informal sector heterogeneity. Taking advantage of the 1-2-3 Surveys in Madagascar, a four-wave panel dataset (2000-04), we assess the magnitude of various formal/informal sector earnings gaps. Is there an informal sector job earnings penalty? Do some informal sector jobs provide pecuniary premiums and which ones? Do possible gaps vary along the earnings distribution? Ignoring distributional issues is indeed a strong limitation, given the compound question of how informality affects earnings inequality. We address heterogeneity issues at three different levels: the worker, the employment status (wage employment vs. self-employment) and the earnings distribution. Standard earnings equations are estimated at the mean and at various conditional quantiles of the earnings distribution. The results suggest that the sign and magnitude of the formal informal sector earnings gaps highly depend on the workers' employment status and on their relative position in the earnings distribution. In the case of a poor and fragile country like Madagascar, these findings provide new and robust empirical backups for the existence of a mix between the traditional exclusion vs. exit hypotheses of the informal sector. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管非正式部门的经济结构在发展中国家占主要地位,但相对于正规部门,人们对非正式部门的收入结构知之甚少。尽管有关该主题的大多数论文都来自(新兴的)拉丁美洲,亚洲或一些非洲国家,但马达加斯加却是一个有趣的案例。到目前为止,总体上很少有研究,甚至在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的研究较少,使用面板数据来提供非正规部门异质性的证据。利用马达加斯加的1-2-3调查(四波面板数据集(2000-04)),我们评估了各种正式/非正式部门收入差距的程度。是否有非正规部门的工作收入罚款?某些非正规部门的工作是否提供金钱保险费?收入分配可能存在差距吗?考虑到非正式性如何影响收入不平等的复合问题,忽略分配问题确实是一个强大的限制。我们在三个不同层次上处理异质性问题:工人,就业状况(工资就业与自雇)和收入分配。标准收益方程式是根据收益分布的均值和各种条件分位数估算的。结果表明,正规非正规部门收入差距的迹象和程度在很大程度上取决于工人的就业状况及其在收入分配中的相对地位。对于像马达加斯加这样的贫穷而脆弱的国家,这些发现为传统排斥和非正规部门退出假设之间的混合存在提供了新的有力的经验支持。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号