...
首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Aid, Growth, and Devolution: Considering Aid Modality and Different Types of Decentralization
【24h】

Aid, Growth, and Devolution: Considering Aid Modality and Different Types of Decentralization

机译:援助,增长和权力下放:考虑援助方式和不同类型的权力下放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we provide further evidence on the relationship between decentralization and foreign aid effectiveness. Our previous work has shown that decentralization decreases aid effectiveness, i.e., the impact of aid on economic growth is negative in decentralized countries. However, our previous work has not taken different types of aid and different types of decentralization into account, which is at the heart of our current analysis. We consider different measures of decentralization, in particular measures of fiscal decentralization derived from government finance statistics and measures of political decentralization that are constructed based on countries' constitutional rules. In addition, we take different types of aid into account: grants, loans, technical assistance, total net ODA; and we distinguish between multi-lateral and bi-lateral aid in order to consider differences in the donor structure. Our empirical analysis is based on panel data of up to 53 developing countries. In our growth regressions, we combine all types of decentralization with the different types of aid. We find important differences between different types of decentralization: (i) fiscal decentralization negatively affects aid effectiveness (in line with our previous work), (ii) employment decentralization may increase aid effectiveness, and (iii) political decentralization does not hamper aid effectiveness or may even have positive effects. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们提供了关于权力下放与外国援助有效性之间关系的进一步证据。我们以前的工作表明,权力下放降低了援助的效力,即在权力下放的国家,援助对经济增长的影响是负面的。但是,我们以前的工作没有考虑不同类型的援助和不同类型的权力下放,这是我们当前分析的核心。我们考虑了不同的权力下放措施,特别是根据政府财政统计数据得出的财政权力下放措施以及基于国家宪法规则构建的政治权力下放措施。此外,我们考虑了不同类型的援助:赠款,贷款,技术援助,官方发展援助净额总额;并且我们区分多边和双边援助,以考虑捐助者结构的差异。我们的经验分析是基于多达53个发展中国家的面板数据。在我们的增长回归中,我们将所有类型的权力下放与不同类型的援助相结合。我们发现不同类型的权力下放之间存在重要差异:(i)财政分权对援助有效性产生负面影响(与我们先前的工作一致);(ii)就业分权可能会提高援助有效性;(iii)政治分权不会妨碍援助有效性或甚至可能产生积极影响。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号