...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA internal medicine >Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:预防30天的医院再次入院:对随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

IMPORTANCE: Reducing early (30 days) hospital readmissions is a policy priority aimed at improving health care quality. The cumulative complexity model conceptualizes patient context. It predicts that highly supportive discharge interventions will enhance patient capacity to enact burdensome self-care and avoid readmissions. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence of the efficacy of interventions to reduce early hospital readmissions and identify intervention features-including their impact on treatment burden and on patients' capacity to enact postdischarge self-care-that might explain their varying effects. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, and Scopus (1990 until April 1, 2013), contacted experts, and reviewed bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials that assessed the effect of interventions on all-cause or unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge in adult patients hospitalized for a medical or surgical cause for more than 24 hours and discharged to home. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Reviewer pairs extracted trial characteristics and used an activity-based coding strategy to characterize the interventions; fidelity was confirmed with authors. Blinded to trial outcomes, reviewers noted the extent to which interventions placed additional work on patients after discharge or supported their capacity for self-care in accordance with the cumulative complexity model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relative risk of all-cause or unplanned readmission with or without out-of-hospital deaths at 30 days postdischarge. RESULTS: In 42 trials, the tested interventions prevented early readmissions (pooled random-effects relative risk, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.73-0.91]; P .001; I2 = 31%), a finding that was consistent across patient subgroups. Trials published before 2002 reported interventions that were 1.6 times more effective than those tested later (interaction P = .01). In exploratory subgroup analyses, interventions with many components (interaction P = .001), involving more individuals in care delivery (interaction P = .05), and supporting patient capacity for self-care (interaction P = .04) were 1.4, 1.3, and 1.3 times more effective than other interventions, respectively. A post hoc regression model showed incremental value in providing comprehensive, postdischarge support to patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tested interventions are effective at reducing readmissions, but more effective interventions are complex and support patient capacity for self-care. Interventions tested more recently are less effective.
机译:重要信息:减少早期(<30天)住院率是提高医疗质量的一项政策重点。累积复杂度模型将患者情境概念化。它预测高度支持性出院干预将增强患者进行繁重的自我护理并避免再次入院的能力。目的:综合采取干预措施以减少早期医院再次入院的有效性的证据,并确定干预措施的特征(包括其对治疗负担的影响以及对患者出院后自我护理能力的影响),以解释其不同的作用。数据来源:我们搜索了PubMed,Ovid MEDLINE,Ovid EMBASE,EBSCO CINAHL和Scopus(1990年至2013年4月1日),联系了专家并审查了参考书目。研究选择:随机试验评估了因内科或外科原因住院超过24小时并出院的成年患者出院后30天内干预对全因或计划外再入的影响。数据提取和综合:审阅者对提取试验特征并使用基于活动的编码策略来表征干预措施。保真度得到了作者的证实。对试验结果视而不见,评论者注意到干预措施在出院后对患者进行更多工作或根据累积复杂性模型支持其自我护理能力的程度。主要结果和措施:出院后30天全因或计划外再次入院的相对风险,无论院内是否死亡。结果:在42项试验中,所测试的干预措施可防止早期再入院(合并随机效应相对危险度为0.82 [95%CI,0.73-0.91]; P <.001; I2 = 31%),这一发现在患者亚组中是一致的。 2002年之前发布的试验报告说,干预措施的有效性是后来进行测试的1.6倍(交互作用P = 0.01)。在探索性亚组分析中,涉及多个组成部分(交互作用P = .001),涉及更多个人参与护理服务(交互作用P = .05)以及支持患者自我护理能力(交互作用P = .04)的干预措施分别为1.4、1.3。 ,效果分别是其他干预措施的1.3倍。事后回归模型显示出在为患者和护理人员提供全面的出院后支持方面的增值作用。结论和相关性:经过测试的干预措施可有效减少再入院,但更有效的干预措施则复杂且可支持患者的自我护理能力。最近测试的干预效果较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号