首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Kissing balloon or sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provisional stenting of bifurcations: Lessons from micro-computed tomography and computational simulations
【24h】

Kissing balloon or sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provisional stenting of bifurcations: Lessons from micro-computed tomography and computational simulations

机译:接吻球囊或侧支和主血管的顺序扩张,以用于临时分叉支架置入:微型计算机断层扫描和计算机模拟的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study sought to evaluate post-dilation strategies in bifurcation stenting. In bifurcation stenting practice, it is still controversial how post-dilation should be performed and whether the kissing balloon (KB) technique is mandatory when only the main vessel (MV) receives a stent. A series of drug-eluting stents (DES) (n = 26) were deployed in a coronary bifurcation model following a provisional approach. After the deployment of the stent in the MV, post-dilation with the KB technique was compared with a 2-step, sequential post-dilation of the side branch (SB) and MV without kissing. The percentage of the SB lumen area free of stent struts was similar after KB (79.1 ± 8.7%) and after the 2-step sequence (74.4 ± 11.6%, p = 0.25), a considerable improvement compared with MV stenting only without dilation of the stent at the SB ostium (30.8 ± 7.8%, p < 0.0001). The rate of strut malapposition in the ostium was 21.3 ± 9.2% after KB and 24.9 ± 10.4% after the 2-step sequence, respectively, a significant reduction compared with a simple SB dilation (55.3 ± 16.8%, p < 0.0001) or MV stenting only (47.0 ± 8.5%, p < 0.0005). KB created a significant elliptical overexpansion of the MV lumen, inducing higher stress concentration proximal to the SB. KB also led to a higher risk of incomplete stent apposition at the proximal stent edge (30.7 ± 26.4% vs. 2.8 ± 9.6% for 2-step, p = 0.0016). Sequential 2-step post-dilation of the SB and MV may offer a simpler and more efficient alternative to final KB technique for provisional stenting of bifurcations.
机译:本研究旨在评估分叉支架置入术中的扩张后策略。在分叉支架术中,当仅主血管(MV)接受支架时,应如何进行后扩张以及是否必须使用接吻球囊(KB)技术仍存在争议。按照临时方法,在冠状动脉分叉模型中部署了一系列药物洗脱支架(DES)(n = 26)。在将支架部署在MV中之后,将KB技术的后扩张与2步顺次的侧支(SB)和MV后扩张(不接吻)进行了比较。在KB后(79.1±8.7%)和两步序列后(74.4±11.6%,p = 0.25),无支架撑杆的SB管腔面积百分比相似,与仅进行不扩张的MV支架相比有相当大的改善SB口处的支架(30.8±7.8%,p <0.0001)。在进行两步手术后,KB后口的支柱错位率分别为21.3±9.2%和2步骤后的24.9±10.4%,与单纯SB扩张法(55.3±16.8%,p <0.0001)或MV相比,显着降低仅置入支架(47.0±8.5%,p <0.0005)。 KB在MV管腔中产生了明显的椭圆形过度膨胀,从而在SB附近产生了较高的应力集中。 KB还导致支架近端边缘不完全并置的风险更高(30.7±26.4%比2步2.8±9.6%,p = 0.0016)。 SB和MV的顺序两步后扩张术可以为分叉临时支架的最终KB技术提供更简单,更有效的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号