首页> 外文期刊>Cladistics: The international journal of the Willi Hennig Society >Molecular systematics of teioid lizards (Teioidea/Gymnophthalmoidea: Squamata) based on the analysis of 48 loci under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment
【24h】

Molecular systematics of teioid lizards (Teioidea/Gymnophthalmoidea: Squamata) based on the analysis of 48 loci under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment

机译:基于树木排列和相似排列的48个基因座的类ei蜥蜴(Teioidea / Gymnophthalmoidea:Squamata)分子系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We infer phylogenetic relationships within Teioidea, a superfamily of Nearctic and Neotropical lizards, using nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic analyses relied on parsimony under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment, with length variation (i.e. gaps) treated as evidence and as absence of evidence, and maximum-likelihood under similarity-alignment with gaps as absence of evidence. All analyses produced almost completely resolved trees despite 86% of missing data. Tree-alignment produced the shortest trees, the strict consensus of which is more similar to the maximum-likelihood tree than to any of the other parsimony trees, in terms of both number of clades shared, parsimony cost and likelihood scores. Comparisons of tree costs suggest that the pattern of indels inferred by similarity-alignment drove parsimony analyses on similarity-aligned sequences away from more optimal solutions. All analyses agree in a majority of clades, although they differ from each other in unique ways, suggesting that neither the criterion of optimality, alignment nor treatment of indels alone can explain all differences. Parsimony rejects the monophyly of Gymnophthalmidae due to the position of Alopoglossinae relative to Teiidae, whereas support of Gymnophthalmidae by maximum-likelihood was low. We address various nomenclatural issues, including Gymnophthalmidae Fitzinger, 1826 being an older name than Teiidae Gray, 1827. We recognize three families in the arrangement Alopoglossidae+(Teiidae+Gymnophthalmidae). Within Gymnophthalmidae we recognize Cercosaurinae, Gymnophthalminae, Rhachisaurinae and Riolaminae in the relationship Cercosaurinae+(Rhachisaurinae+(Riolaminae+Gymnophthalminae)). Cercosaurinae is composed of three tribesBachiini, Cercosaurini and Ecpleopodiniand Gymnophthalminae is composed of threeGymnophthalmini, Heterodactylini and Iphisini. Within Teiidae we retain the currently recognized three subfamilies in the arrangement: Callopistinae+(Tupinambinae+Teiinae). We also propose several genus-level changes to restore the monophyly of taxa.
机译:我们使用核苷酸序列推论近尾蜥和新近蜥蜴的超家族Teioidea的系统发育关系。系统发育分析依赖于树木对齐和相似性对齐下的简约性,长度变化(即缺口)被视为证据和缺乏证据,而相似性对齐下具有缺口的最大似然被视为证据。尽管丢失了86%的数据,但所有分析都生成了几乎完全分解的树。树木排列产生了最短的树木,就共享枝条数目,简约成本和似然性分数而言,其严格的共识与最大似然树比其他简约树更相似。树成本的比较表明,由相似性比对推断出的插入缺失模式使对相似性比对序列的简约分析远离了最佳解。所有分析在大多数进化枝中都一致,尽管它们以独特的方式彼此不同,这表明最佳化,对位或仅对插入缺失的处理都不能解释所有差异。简约的原因是,伞形科相对于Te科具有相对的位置,而简约性则拒绝了裸眼科的单性,而最大似然对裸眼科的支持率很低。我们处理各种各样的命名问题,包括Gymnophthalmidae Fitzinger,1826年比Teiidae Gray,1827年更旧。我们认识到Alopoglossidae +(Teiidae + Gymnophthalmidae)中的三个家族。在裸眼纲科中,我们认识到Cercosaurinae +(Rhachisaurinae +(Riolaminae + Gymnophthalminae))关系中的Cercosaurinae,Gymnophthalminae,Rachisaurinae和Riolaminae。 Cercosaurinae由三个部落组成:Bachiini,Cercosaurini和Ecpleopodini,而Gymnophthalminae则由三个Gymnophthalmini,Herododactylini和Iphisini组成。在Te科内,我们保留了目前公认的三个亚科:Callopistinae +(Tupinambinae + Teiinae)。我们还提出了几个属级别的更改,以恢复分类单元的单一性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号