...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol dependence >Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions for general practice patients with problematic drinking behavior and comorbid anxiety or depressive disorders.
【24h】

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions for general practice patients with problematic drinking behavior and comorbid anxiety or depressive disorders.

机译:短暂的酒精干预对有不良饮酒行为和合并焦虑症或抑郁症的普通病人的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Brief interventions (BIs) are effective methods to reduce problematic drinking. It is not known, if the effectiveness of BI differs between patients with or without comorbid depression or anxiety disorders. METHODS: In a randomized controlled BI study with two intervention groups and one control condition, data were collected from 408 general practice (GP) patients with alcohol use disorders, at-risk drinking or binge drinking. 88 participants were diagnosed with comorbid anxiety and/or depressive disorders. The effectiveness of BI was assessed at a 12-month follow-up in relation to the presence and absence of comorbidity. Reduction of drinking in six ordered categories (g/alcohol) between baseline and follow-up served as the outcome variable. RESULTS: BI were significantly related to reduction of drinking in the non-comorbid (-2.64g/alcohol vs. -8.61g/alcohol; p=.03) but not in the comorbid subsample (-22.06g/alcohol vs. -22.09g/alcohol; p=.76). Compared to non-comorbid participants, a significantly higher reduction of drinking was found for comorbid individuals (-6.55g/alcohol vs. -22.08g/alcohol; p=.01). An ordinal regression analysis revealed comorbidity to be a positive predictor for reduction of drinking (estimator=.594; CI=.175-1.013; p<.01). When entering the variables amount of drinking at baseline, intervention and classification of problematic drinking, these became significant predictors, whereas comorbidity showed only a tendency. CONCLUSION: BI did not significantly effect a reduction of drinking in comorbid patients. As BI are known to be less effective for dependent drinkers, a larger proportion of dependents among the comorbid might have limited the effectiveness of BI. Future studies with larger sample sizes of comorbid problem drinkers are necessary to confirm the results.
机译:背景:短暂干预(BI)是减少有问题的饮酒的有效方法。尚不清楚是否有合并抑郁症或焦虑症的患者,BI的疗效是否有所不同。方法:在一项具有两个干预组和一个控制条件的随机对照BI研究中,收集了408名有酒精使用障碍,高危饮酒或暴饮暴食的全科医师(GP)患者的数据。 88名参与者被诊断为合并症焦虑和/或抑郁症。在有和没有合并症的情况下,在12个月的随访中评估了BI的有效性。在基线和随访之间减少六种有序类别(克/酒精)的饮酒是结果变量。结果:在非合并症(-2.64g /酒精对-8.61g /酒精; p = .03)中,BI与饮酒量减少显着相关,但在合并症子样本中(-22.06g /酒精与-22.09)无关。 g /酒精; p = .76)。与非合并症患者相比,合并症患者的饮酒量明显减少(-6.55g /酒精与-22.08g /酒精; p = .01)。序数回归分析显示合并症是饮酒量减少的积极预测因素(估计量= .594; CI = .175-1.013; p <.01)。当输入基线时的可变饮酒量,有问题的饮酒的干预和分类时,这些已成为重要的预测指标,而合并症仅表现出趋势。结论:BI对合并症患者的饮酒量没有明显影响。由于已知BI对依赖饮酒者无效,因此在合并症中,较大比例的依赖者可能限制了BI的有效性。有必要对合并症患者的更大样本量进行进一步研究,以确认结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号